Analyzers for testing electrical characteristics manufacturing · New York

North Atlantic Industries

Bohemia, NY · ~212 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

North Atlantic Industries runs at 11% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Analyzers for testing electrical characteristics manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

North Atlantic Industries: 0.4 TCR = 11% of Analyzers for testing electrical characteristics manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

North Atlantic Industries safety composite

North Atlantic Industries scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 33%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

DART rate
F 0.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

North Atlantic Industries: 0.0 → 0.5 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 1.2 TCR · DART/TCR 1.22× in 2023

North Atlantic Industries's TCR rose 0.5 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.5 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2017 at 1.2 TCR. In 2023, DART was 1.22× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334515 · Bohemia, NY AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.4 · 11% of ind

  • DART 0.5 DART
  • RANK #1/6
  • PHOTO Pronk Technologies I…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~212 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Pronk Technologies Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

North Atlantic Industries in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows North Atlantic Industries averages 0.4 TCR (11% of the Analyzers for testing electrical characteristics manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

North Atlantic Industries TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=1.2 · 2018=0 · 2019=0.5 · 2020=0 · 2022=0.4 · 2023=0.5 · BLS 3.3

Where North Atlantic Industries falls in its industry

125 Analyzers for testing electric establishments

Safer than 83% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 6 Analyzers for testing electric employers in New York.

North Atlantic Industries (212 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 0.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate North Atlantic Industries
North Atlantic Industries (212 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 0.9

North Atlantic Industries has more employees than the Analyzers for testing electrical charact median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.5 0.5 1 0 0
2022 0.4 0.4 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.5 0.5 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 1.2 1.2 2 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334515 · NY · Bohemia

125 Analyzers for testing electrical characteristics manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 77 employers in Bohemia, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Pronk Technologies Inc. 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Teledyne LeCroy PSG 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Landis + Gyr Alpharetta GA 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hubbell / Aclara Meters LLC 0.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Dupli Envelope & Graphics - Syracuse, NY 212 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mason Industries Inc 212 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mini-Circuits 212 FTE
STATE-SIZE MKS Rochester ENI 212 FTE
CITY-NEAR NY-02 4,202 FTE
CITY-NEAR NYSARC Inc. - Suffolk Chapter 817 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6319-020056 632 FTE
CITY-NEAR Island Acoustics, LLC 313 FTE
NAT-TCR The Estabrook Corporation 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Morrow Energy 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Excel Electronics Inc 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR ROC Construction, Inc. 0.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Danfoss 212 FTE
NAT-SIZE Flowers Baking Co. of Lakeland, Inc. 212 FTE
NAT-SIZE Applewood Estates 212 FTE
NAT-SIZE Roanoke, Va 212 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.