Engineering structure (e.g., oil storage tank, water tower) painting · Georgia

North Carolina Service Center

Perry, GA · ~25 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.6
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

North Carolina Service Center runs at 306% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Engineering structure (e.g., oil storage tank, water tower) painting workplace, earning a grade F.

North Carolina Service Center: 8.6 TCR = 306% of Engineering structure (e.g., oil storage tank, water tower) painting BLS 2.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

North Carolina Service Center safety composite

North Carolina Service Center scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 76% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 12%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

North Carolina Service Center: 4.3 → 12.8 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 12.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

North Carolina Service Center's TCR rose 8.5 from 4.3 in 2023 to 12.8 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238320 · Perry, GA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.6 · 306% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #22/23
  • PHOTO EMPAZ, Inc. dba Empi…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~25 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: EMPAZ, Inc. dba EmpireWorks (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

North Carolina Service Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows North Carolina Service Center averages 8.6 TCR (306% of the Engineering structure (e.g., oil storage tank, water tower) painting BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

North Carolina Service Center TCR series: 2023=4.3 · 2024=12.8 · BLS 2.8

Where North Carolina Service Center falls in its industry

582 Engineering structure (e.g., o establishments

Safer than 12% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #22 safest of 23 Engineering structure (e.g., o employers in Georgia.

North Carolina Service Center (25 employees, TCR 8.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 2.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate North Carolina Service Center
North Carolina Service Center (25 employees, TCR 8.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 2.8

North Carolina Service Center has fewer employees than the Engineering structure (e.g., oil storage median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 12.8 0.0 3 0 0
2023 4.3 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238320 · GA · Perry

582 Engineering structure (e.g., oil storage tank, water tower) painting employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 49 employers in Perry, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR EMPAZ, Inc. dba EmpireWorks 8.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Advantage Painting Solutions 8.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Maine Painting Company 8.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR A.A. PAINT & CUSTOM FINISHES, INC. 8.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Four Corners Gin Inc. Co. 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE W.C. Bradley Farms, Inc. 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Metro East TMC (Conyers)- 1465 General Arts Rd. Conyers, GA 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Manchester Operating - 524 Atlantic Street Manchester, GA 25 FTE
CITY-NEAR Perry Plant 1,697 FTE
CITY-NEAR Florida Concrete Services 960 FTE
CITY-NEAR Perry Cook Plant 492 FTE
CITY-NEAR USG Water Solutions, LLC 410 FTE
NAT-TCR Lamar Trailers 8.6 TCR
NAT-TCR The Kingswood Company 8.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Mulberry Creek Assisted Living 8.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Lansdale Hospital 8.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Tardif'S American Brasserie 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Uag Construction, LLC 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wbs - Onalaska 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE SOFIE - Sanford 25 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.