Commercial and industrial machinery repair and maintenance services · Minnesota
North Central Container
New Ulm, MN · ~19 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- F
- Failing Safety Record
- 30.9
- Avg TCR
- 2.1
- Industry avg
- 0
- Fatalities
The verdict
North Central Container runs at 1473% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Commercial and industrial machinery repair and maintenance services workplace, earning a grade F.
- F
- Failing Safety Record
- 30.9
- avg TCR · per 100 workers
- 2.1
- industry benchmark (BLS)
- 11
- recordable injuries tracked
Grade compares North Central Container's OSHA Total Case Rate of 30.9 to the Commercial and industrial machinery repair and maintenance services BLS benchmark of 2.1 (1473% of benchmark) across 2 years of Form 300A filings (2016–2024). <a href="/methodology">See methodology</a> for reporting-limitation caveats.
Injury rate over time
North Central Container's yearly Total Case Rate, against the 2.1 industry benchmark.
Where North Central Container falls in its industry
3,014 Commercial and industrial mach establishmentsSafer than 0% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.2.
Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #59 safest of 59 Commercial and industrial mach employers in Minnesota.
Trend analysis for North Central Container
Between 2016 and 2018, North Central Container's Total Case Rate worsened from 26.6 to 35.2 recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers, a 32% increase across 2 years of OSHA reporting.
The safest year on record was 2016, at a TCR of 26.6, while 2018 saw the highest rate, at 35.2, a spread of 8.6 points between the best and worst reporting years. That's a comparatively narrow spread, suggesting a fairly consistent safety record across the 2 years with a usable rate on file, rather than one outlier year skewing the multi-year average.
Summed across those 2 reporting years, North Central Container recorded 11 total injuries and illnesses, with no fatalities reported in any of those years. Readers comparing establishments should weigh the 2-year trend above alongside establishment size, since a larger workforce naturally accumulates more raw incidents even at a lower per-100-worker rate.
Verify This Employer with OSHA
The 11 injuries shown on this page for North Central Container are sourced from its own 2 years of mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source, name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.
Verify on OSHA Establishment SearchSource: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 811310 - Commercial and industrial machinery repair and maintenance services.
DART Rate, Transparent Calculation (2018)
What is the DART rate formula?
DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.
1 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 34,058 hours worked = 5.87 DART
Methodology: 29 CFR 1904, OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping
Cross-Validating Context, Establishment vs Industry vs State
| Benchmark | TCR | Source |
|---|---|---|
| North Central Container (this establishment) | 30.94 | OSHA ITA Form 300A, 2-year avg |
| Electric motor repair and maintenance services, commercial or industrial industry avg | 2.10 | BLS IIF, NAICS 811310 |
| Minnesota state avg (all industries) | 5.18 | OSHA ITA, state-level rollup |
Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program
Reportable Incident Timeline
Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by North Central Container to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.
- 2018: 6 reportable incidents · 6 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2016: 5 reportable incidents · 5 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) - inspection case-number records
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 35.2 | 5.9 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 26.6 | 16.0 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
What this grade means for you
Use this grade as a relative read on North Central Container's reported OSHA injury record versus its Commercial and industrial machinery repair and maintenance services peers, not a verdict on whether any single site is safe today.
- At 1473% of the Commercial and industrial machinery repair and maintenance services benchmark, North Central Container reports more injuries than typical peers, ask specifically how the employer is reducing them. Know your rights
- Judge this record against the wider Commercial and industrial machinery repair and maintenance services sector, where injury rates vary widely, before comparing it in isolation. See the industry
- Grades reflect 2016–2024 filings; check the latest establishment record straight from OSHA, or look up a different employer. Look up another
Safety grades reflect employers' self-reported OSHA Form 300A filings from 2016 to 2024 and can lag current conditions. A grade is not a guarantee that any specific workplace is safe or unsafe today. See our methodology and disclaimer.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is North Central Container's safety grade?
How many injuries has North Central Container reported?
Similar Employers
Matched by safety record across the industry, by workforce size within Minnesota, and by nearby establishments in New Ulm - a different peer set than the category browse links below.
Similar TCR (~30.9)
Similar size (~19 workers)
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.