Trucking, general freight, long-distance, less-than-truckload (LTL) · South Carolina

North Charleston CHR

North Charleston, SC · ~44 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.6
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

North Charleston CHR runs at 102% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Trucking, general freight, long-distance, less-than-truckload (LTL) workplace, earning a grade C.

North Charleston CHR: 4.6 TCR = 102% of Trucking, general freight, long-distance, less-than-truckload (LTL) BLS 4.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

North Charleston CHR safety composite

North Charleston CHR scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 64% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

North Charleston CHR: 0.0 → 3.6 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 12.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0.79× in 2024

North Charleston CHR's TCR rose 3.6 from 0.0 in 2016 to 3.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 12.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.79× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484122 · North Charleston, SC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 4.6 · 102% of ind

  • DART 3.6 DART
  • RANK #15/46
  • PHOTO Beaumont TX FXFE-BMT
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~44 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Beaumont TX FXFE-BMT (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

North Charleston CHR in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows North Charleston CHR averages 4.6 TCR (102% of the Trucking, general freight, long-distance, less-than-truckload (LTL) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

North Charleston CHR TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=12.3 · 2018=8.1 · 2019=2.8 · 2020=0 · 2022=5.3 · 2023=4.5 · 2024=3.6 · BLS 4.5

Where North Charleston CHR falls in its industry

3,020 Trucking, general freight, lon establishments

Safer than 64% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 46 Trucking, general freight, lon employers in South Carolina.

North Charleston CHR (44 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 5.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate North Charleston CHR
North Charleston CHR (44 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 5.6

North Charleston CHR has fewer employees than the Trucking, general freight, long-distance median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.6 3.6 2 0 0
2023 4.5 4.5 3 0 0
2022 5.3 4.0 4 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.8 2.8 1 0 0
2018 8.1 8.1 3 0 0
2017 12.3 6.2 4 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484122 · SC · North Charleston

3,020 Trucking, general freight, long-distance, less-than-truckload (LTL) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 256 employers in North Charleston, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Beaumont TX FXFE-BMT 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Quincy IL FXFE-QCY 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dedicated Systems, Inc 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR ABF Freight 134 4.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE 6728-00030023-26 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lee Steam Station 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lake Marion Maintenance 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE METRO COLUMBIA CREW QUARTERS 44 FTE
CITY-NEAR Charleston County 2,601 FTE
CITY-NEAR Palmetto Goodwill Services 1,105 FTE
CITY-NEAR Trident Medical Center 1,015 FTE
CITY-NEAR SRC Charleston ISS Division 815 FTE
NAT-TCR Stonewall Canyon Winery 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR American Castings 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Pflugerville Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Ardagh Glass Inc Dunkirk 4.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE BryCoat Inc. 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Northern Illinois Steel Supply Co. 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Avon 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE 3086 Keystone Orlando 44 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.