Sewage treatment plants or facilities · South Carolina

North Charleston Sewer District

Charleston, SC · ~80 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.4
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

North Charleston Sewer District runs at 535% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Sewage treatment plants or facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

North Charleston Sewer District: 6.4 TCR = 535% of Sewage treatment plants or facilities BLS 1.2 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

North Charleston Sewer District safety composite

North Charleston Sewer District scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

34/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

North Charleston Sewer District: 4.3 → 5.0 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 12.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.77× in 2024

North Charleston Sewer District's TCR rose 0.6 from 4.3 in 2021 to 5.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 12.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.77× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221320 · Charleston, SC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 6.4 · 535% of ind

  • DART 5.0 DART
  • RANK #10/10
  • PHOTO Public Works
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~80 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Public Works (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

North Charleston Sewer District in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows North Charleston Sewer District averages 6.4 TCR (535% of the Sewage treatment plants or facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

North Charleston Sewer District TCR series: 2021=4.3 · 2022=12.9 · 2023=3.4 · 2024=5 · BLS 1.2

Where North Charleston Sewer District falls in its industry

400 Sewage treatment plants or fac establishments

Safer than 33% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 10 Sewage treatment plants or fac employers in South Carolina.

North Charleston Sewer District (80 employees, TCR 6.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate North Charleston Sewer District
North Charleston Sewer District (80 employees, TCR 6.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.4

North Charleston Sewer District has more employees than the Sewage treatment plants or facilities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.0 5.0 3 0 0
2023 3.4 1.7 2 0 0
2022 12.9 4.8 6 2 0
2021 4.3 0.0 2 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221320 · SC · Charleston

400 Sewage treatment plants or facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 341 employers in Charleston, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Public Works 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR SHELLEY'S ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Greater Peoria Sanitary District 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Regional Waste Water Treatment Plant 6.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE WILLIAMS STEAM PLANT 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE NNOB - VC Summer Units 1, 2, 3 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE CHARLESTON GAS OPERATIONS 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lennar - Coastal Carolinas (Myrtle Beach) 80 FTE
CITY-NEAR Medical University Hospital Authority 8,204 FTE
CITY-NEAR Medical University of South Carolina 5,881 FTE
CITY-NEAR SC-03 4,525 FTE
CITY-NEAR SAFETY MANAGEMENT DIVISION 1,790 FTE
NAT-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - DYO5 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - SLC9 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR AAW - New Haven 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Morrisania Consolidation 6.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sullivan Roofing Inc 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE California Expert Tree Solutions 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE Atlanta Marriott Northeast Emory 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE Grunder Landscaping Company 80 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.