Commercial lithographic (offset) printing (except books) · Florida

North Flagler

Fort Lauderdale, FL · ~21 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

North Flagler runs at 42% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Commercial lithographic (offset) printing (except books) workplace, earning a grade A.

North Flagler: 1.4 TCR = 42% of Commercial lithographic (offset) printing (except books) BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

North Flagler safety composite

North Flagler scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

72/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−11.1

2016→2024

North Flagler injury rate improved

North Flagler's TCR fell 11.1 from 11.1 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 11.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=11.1 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 323111 · Fort Lauderdale, FL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.4 · 42% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #11/63
  • PHOTO Jackson Group
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~21 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Jackson Group (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

North Flagler in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows North Flagler averages 1.4 TCR (42% of the Commercial lithographic (offset) printing (except books) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

North Flagler TCR series: 2016=11.1 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where North Flagler falls in its industry

2,001 Commercial lithographic (offse establishments

Safer than 78% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 63 Commercial lithographic (offse employers in Florida.

North Flagler (21 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate North Flagler
North Flagler (21 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6

North Flagler has fewer employees than the Commercial lithographic (offset) printin median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 11.1 11.1 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

323111 · FL · Fort Lauderdale

2,001 Commercial lithographic (offset) printing (except books) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 374 employers in Fort Lauderdale, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Jackson Group 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Topflight Corporation 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Belmark Arizona 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR PerkinElmer - Greenville 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE SMR Farms 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Woerner Farms LLC - CLA 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Parkesdale Farms Packing & Cooling Inc. 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE TELOGIA POWER LLC 21 FTE
CITY-NEAR Spirit Airlines - FLL 3,426 FTE
CITY-NEAR Holy Cross Long Term Care Inc 2,979 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fort Lauderdale (FLL) 2,703 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hotwire Communications - Cypress 953 FTE
NAT-TCR Webster Machine Works LLC 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Allied Building Stores, Inc. (Monroe Office) 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Menasha Packaging Company - Neenah 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Arcon/R&E - ARCo 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE A&R Services 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Miner County Pork Sow Farm 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Indiana Sow Farm 3 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE 21st Century Sow Farm 21 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.