Fire departments (e.g., government, volunteer (except private)) · Washington

North Kitsap Fire and Rescue

Kingston, WA · ~59 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
16.1
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

North Kitsap Fire and Rescue runs at 502% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Fire departments (e.g., government, volunteer (except private)) workplace, earning a grade F.

North Kitsap Fire and Rescue: 16.1 TCR = 502% of Fire departments (e.g., government, volunteer (except private)) BLS 3.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

North Kitsap Fire and Rescue safety composite

North Kitsap Fire and Rescue scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 21%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 16.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−11.5

2021→2023

North Kitsap Fire and Rescue injury rate improved

North Kitsap Fire and Rescue's TCR fell 11.5 from 26.3 in 2021 to 14.8 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 26.3 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.51× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=26.3 · 2022=7.2 · 2023=14.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 922160 · Kingston, WA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 16.1 · 502% of ind

  • DART 8.2 DART
  • RANK #19/28
  • PHOTO City of Fairfax Fire…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~59 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: City of Fairfax Fire Department (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

North Kitsap Fire and Rescue in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows North Kitsap Fire and Rescue averages 16.1 TCR (502% of the Fire departments (e.g., government, volunteer (except private)) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

North Kitsap Fire and Rescue TCR series: 2021=26.3 · 2022=7.2 · 2023=14.8 · BLS 3.2

Where North Kitsap Fire and Rescue falls in its industry

793 Fire departments (e.g., govern establishments

Safer than 21% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 9.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #19 safest of 28 Fire departments (e.g., govern employers in Washington.

North Kitsap Fire and Rescue (59 employees, TCR 16.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 9.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate North Kitsap Fire and Rescue
North Kitsap Fire and Rescue (59 employees, TCR 16.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 9.8

North Kitsap Fire and Rescue has more employees than the Fire departments (e.g., government, volu median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 9.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 14.8 8.2 9 0 0
2022 7.2 5.4 4 0 0
2021 26.3 20.1 4 13 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

922160 · WA · Kingston

793 Fire departments (e.g., government, volunteer (except private)) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 6 employers in Kingston, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR City of Fairfax Fire Department 16.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR FIRE PUB. SAFETY 475 S. 300 E. 16.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Carlton Fire and Ambulance 16.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR City of Albany Fire Station 12 16.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE John I. Haas, Inc. - Warehouse Division 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nationwide Solar 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE Precision Concrete LLC 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE CHG Building Systems, Inc. 59 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4054-ABS-0027-0026-00186 112 FTE
CITY-NEAR ABS-0027-0026-00186 FAC-00186-KINGSTON-WA 110 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4054-ABS 0026 0186 97 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kingston WA Yard 29 FTE
NAT-TCR Washington, Ut #00528 16.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Town of Middlebury 16.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Wastewater Reclamation Facility 16.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Carter Place 16.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE American Products Inc. 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Buttura and Sons Inc 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pr Operations LLC 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE B03 Medcrest -Lithia Springs 59 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.