Skilled nursing facilities · Georgia

Northeast Atlanta Health and Rehabilitation Center

Atlanta, GA · ~134 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.9
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Northeast Atlanta Health and Rehabilitation Center runs at 61% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade B.

Northeast Atlanta Health and Rehabilitation Center: 3.9 TCR = 61% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Northeast Atlanta Health and Rehabilitation Center safety composite

Northeast Atlanta Health and Rehabilitation Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 3.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.7

2016→2018

Northeast Atlanta Health and Rehabilitation Center injury rate improved

Northeast Atlanta Health and Rehabilitation Center's TCR fell 3.7 from 5.4 in 2016 to 1.8 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 5.4 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.45× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.4 · 2017=4.7 · 2018=1.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Atlanta, GA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 3.9 · 61% of ind

  • DART 1.8 DART
  • RANK #61/259
  • PHOTO Canal View~Houghton …
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~134 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Canal View~Houghton County (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Northeast Atlanta Health and Rehabilitation Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Northeast Atlanta Health and Rehabilitation Center averages 3.9 TCR (61% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Northeast Atlanta Health and Rehabilitation Center TCR series: 2016=5.4 · 2017=4.7 · 2018=1.8 · BLS 6.5

Where Northeast Atlanta Health and Rehabilitation Center falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 75% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #61 safest of 259 Skilled nursing facilities employers in Georgia.

Northeast Atlanta Health and Rehabilitation Center (134 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Northeast Atlanta Health and Rehabilitation Center
Northeast Atlanta Health and Rehabilitation Center (134 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Northeast Atlanta Health and Rehabilitation Center has more employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 1.8 1.8 2 0 0
2017 4.7 1.9 5 0 0
2016 5.4 3.6 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · GA · Atlanta

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 1,907 employers in Atlanta, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Canal View~Houghton County 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Northfield Care Center 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR St Monica Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Madisonville Health and Rehabilitation, LLC 3.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sawmill 134 FTE
STATE-SIZE DRB Group Georgia, LLC 134 FTE
STATE-SIZE Milliken & Company - Alma Plant 134 FTE
STATE-SIZE Calhoun BCF 134 FTE
CITY-NEAR Insight Global 20,586 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - ATL Airport 19,423 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - ATL- Airport 18,018 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northside 13,761 FTE
NAT-TCR Shopko Hometown #749 (St James, MN) 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Zimmer-Biomet North (Warsaw) 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Xcelerated Transportation Group LLC dba Xcelerated Transport 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR JX Peterbilt - Green Bay 3.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Virgin Valley Cab LLC 134 FTE
NAT-SIZE F.X. Matt Brewing - Utica 134 FTE
NAT-SIZE Clarksburg 134 FTE
NAT-SIZE Halls LLC 134 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.