Fire sprinkler system installation · Massachusetts

Northeast Automatic Sprinkler Co., Inc.

Kingston, MA · ~45 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Northeast Automatic Sprinkler Co., Inc. runs at 72% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Fire sprinkler system installation workplace, earning a grade B.

Northeast Automatic Sprinkler Co., Inc.: 2.0 TCR = 72% of Fire sprinkler system installation BLS 2.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Northeast Automatic Sprinkler Co., Inc. safety composite

Northeast Automatic Sprinkler Co., Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 68% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 19%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Northeast Automatic Sprinkler Co., Inc.: 2.5 → 4.4 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 6.8 TCR · DART/TCR 2.19× in 2024

Northeast Automatic Sprinkler Co., Inc.'s TCR rose 1.9 from 2.5 in 2016 to 4.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 6.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 2.19× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238220 · Kingston, MA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 72% of ind

  • DART 4.4 DART
  • RANK #38/140
  • PHOTO GWS Contractors
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~45 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: GWS Contractors (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Northeast Automatic Sprinkler Co., Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Northeast Automatic Sprinkler Co., Inc. averages 2.0 TCR (72% of the Fire sprinkler system installation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Northeast Automatic Sprinkler Co., Inc. TCR series: 2016=2.5 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=4.4 · 2022=6.8 · 2023=0 · 2024=4.4 · BLS 2.8

Where Northeast Automatic Sprinkler Co., Inc. falls in its industry

5,793 Fire sprinkler system installa establishments

Safer than 68% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #38 safest of 140 Fire sprinkler system installa employers in Massachusetts.

Northeast Automatic Sprinkler Co., Inc. (45 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Northeast Automatic Sprinkler Co., Inc.
Northeast Automatic Sprinkler Co., Inc. (45 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Northeast Automatic Sprinkler Co., Inc. has fewer employees than the Fire sprinkler system installation median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.4 4.4 2 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 6.8 6.8 3 0 0
2021 4.4 2.2 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 2.5 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238220 · MA · Kingston

5,793 Fire sprinkler system installation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 24 employers in Kingston, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR GWS Contractors 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 0F94 - AURORA FIRE 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Multi-Craft Contractors, Inc. Springdale, AR 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Federal Fire Protection 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Resinate, Inc. - Douglas 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE Canal Generating LLC 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE NORTHAMPTON-MA32 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE WILMINGTON-MA57 45 FTE
CITY-NEAR wingate at silver lake 237 FTE
CITY-NEAR L. Knife & Son 229 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1495 - Kingston 192 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wingate 187 FTE
NAT-TCR Dedicated Idaho 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Bentley Builders LLC 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Trans 765 S. Kirkman Rd 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Sterling Engineering 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Grunloh Construction Inc. 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE Charbon Contracting LLC 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bastrop ISD 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE El Paso Emergency Squad 45 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.