Support activities for oil & gas operations · Pennsylvania

Northeast : Pittsburgh Office

Pittsburgh, PA · ~213 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.1
Avg TCR
1.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Northeast : Pittsburgh Office runs at 5% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Support activities for oil & gas operations workplace, earning a grade A.

Northeast : Pittsburgh Office: 0.1 TCR = 5% of Support activities for oil & gas operations BLS 1.9 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Northeast : Pittsburgh Office safety composite

Northeast : Pittsburgh Office scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 98% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 98% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.5

2016→2024

Northeast : Pittsburgh Office injury rate improved

Northeast : Pittsburgh Office's TCR fell 0.5 from 0.5 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 0.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.5 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 213112 · Pittsburgh, PA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.1 · 5% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/15
  • PHOTO EER - Corporate - 01
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~213 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: EER - Corporate - 01 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Northeast : Pittsburgh Office in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Northeast : Pittsburgh Office averages 0.1 TCR (5% of the Support activities for oil & gas operations BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Northeast : Pittsburgh Office TCR series: 2016=0.5 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.9

Where Northeast : Pittsburgh Office falls in its industry

467 Support activities for oil & g establishments

Safer than 98% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 15 Support activities for oil & g employers in Pennsylvania.

Northeast : Pittsburgh Office (213 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 122 employees and a TCR of 0.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 012345 Average employees Total Case Rate Northeast : Pittsburgh Office
Northeast : Pittsburgh Office (213 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 122 employees and a TCR of 0.9

Northeast : Pittsburgh Office has more employees than the Support activities for oil & gas operati median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.5 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

213112 · PA · Pittsburgh

467 Support activities for oil & gas operations employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 1,170 employers in Pittsburgh, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR EER - Corporate - 01 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 11909 Spencer Road 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Covenant Testing Technologies 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gordon Technologies, LLC 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Nello Construction 213 FTE
STATE-SIZE American Lighting & Signalization LLC 077 213 FTE
STATE-SIZE Treehouse Private Brands Inc 213 FTE
STATE-SIZE YORK PLANT 213 FTE
CITY-NEAR United States Steel COrporation 15,229 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Pittsburgh- Oakland 14,135 FTE
CITY-NEAR UPMC Presbyterian Shadyside (PUH) 13,900 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Pittsburgh-Oakland 13,208 FTE
NAT-TCR Madison 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Chevron Phillips Chemical Company Borger Plant 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR The Weitz Company - Florida Office 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR One Energy Plaza 0.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ingevity Georgia LLC 213 FTE
NAT-SIZE Massey Construction, Inc 213 FTE
NAT-SIZE 711 Stewart Ave 213 FTE
NAT-SIZE Unitex Newburgh 213 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.