For-sale builders (i.e., building on own land, for sale), residential · California

Northern California Division

Pleasanton, CA · ~60 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Northern California Division runs at 13% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical For-sale builders (i.e., building on own land, for sale), residential workplace, earning a grade A.

Northern California Division: 0.5 TCR = 13% of For-sale builders (i.e., building on own land, for sale), residential BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Northern California Division safety composite

Northern California Division scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 93% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

75/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 93% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.0

2019→2023

Northern California Division injury rate improved

Northern California Division's TCR fell 2.0 from 2.0 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2019 at 2.0 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=2.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236117 · Pleasanton, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 13% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/43
  • PHOTO Trendmaker Homes
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~60 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Trendmaker Homes (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Northern California Division in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Northern California Division averages 0.5 TCR (13% of the For-sale builders (i.e., building on own land, for sale), residential BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Northern California Division TCR series: 2019=2 · 2020=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Northern California Division falls in its industry

341 For-sale builders (i.e., build establishments

Safer than 93% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 43 For-sale builders (i.e., build employers in California.

Northern California Division (60 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 79 employees and a TCR of 1.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Northern California Division
Northern California Division (60 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 79 employees and a TCR of 1.7

Northern California Division has fewer employees than the For-sale builders (i.e., building on own median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.0 2.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236117 · CA · Pleasanton

341 For-sale builders (i.e., building on own land, for sale), residential employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 169 employers in Pleasanton, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Trendmaker Homes 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Blazer Building Texas, LLC 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Construction 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR NAN 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE North Coast Vineyards 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sun Pacific Farming Cooperative, Inc | Grapes Delano 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE Paiva Farm Management 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rocket Farms Herbs Inc Thermal 60 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 138 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 624 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pleasanton Campus 1,561 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sciens Building Solutions LLC 1,472 FTE
NAT-TCR Tower Eight Staffing Solutions dba Labor For Hire - EB Construction 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Entergy Independence Steam Electric Station 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Pti 5 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR LBCLTXHV 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Peoria Marriott Pere Marquette 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE Holiday Inn Portland South 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amery Hospital and Clinic West Campus 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE Unit #2840 60 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.