Warehouse construction (e.g., commercial, industrial, manufacturing, private) · Minnesota

Northern Valley Machine

East Grand Forks, MN · ~70 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.0
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Northern Valley Machine runs at 35% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Warehouse construction (e.g., commercial, industrial, manufacturing, private) workplace, earning a grade A.

Northern Valley Machine: 1.0 TCR = 35% of Warehouse construction (e.g., commercial, industrial, manufacturing, private) BLS 2.9 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Northern Valley Machine safety composite

Northern Valley Machine scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.5

2019→2024

Northern Valley Machine injury rate improved

Northern Valley Machine's TCR fell 2.5 from 2.5 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 2.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=2.5 · 2020=1.3 · 2022=1.3 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · East Grand Forks, MN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.0 · 35% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #12/130
  • PHOTO Tarlton Corporation
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~70 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Tarlton Corporation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Northern Valley Machine in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Northern Valley Machine averages 1.0 TCR (35% of the Warehouse construction (e.g., commercial, industrial, manufacturing, private) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Northern Valley Machine TCR series: 2019=2.5 · 2020=1.3 · 2022=1.3 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.9

Where Northern Valley Machine falls in its industry

4,692 Warehouse construction (e.g., establishments

Safer than 78% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 130 Warehouse construction (e.g., employers in Minnesota.

Northern Valley Machine (70 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Northern Valley Machine
Northern Valley Machine (70 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Northern Valley Machine has more employees than the Warehouse construction (e.g., commercial median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 1.3 1.3 1 0 0
2020 1.3 0.0 1 0 0
2019 2.5 1.2 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · MN · East Grand Forks

4,692 Warehouse construction (e.g., commercial, industrial, manufacturing, private) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 18 employers in East Grand Forks, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Tarlton Corporation 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Black Horse Group 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR FGG Isaac 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ridgetop Interiors Inc 1.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Harmony 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE St. Cloud Service Center 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE H2I Group 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE Retail Construction Services, Inc. 70 FTE
CITY-NEAR AMERICAN CRYSTAL SUGAR COMPANY EAST GRAND FORKS 406 FTE
CITY-NEAR ISD #595 263 FTE
CITY-NEAR R. J. Zavoral & Sons, Inc. 131 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hugo's #5 126 FTE
NAT-TCR COP Construction LLC 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR NY41 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Circor Pumping Technologies 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Margaritaville Hotel Nashville 1.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Rovira Foods Inc. 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE AGLC Gwinnett RBC 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE Albrecht Birkenbuel Inc 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE Reitnouer Inc 70 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.