Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · North Carolina

Northlake House

Charlotte, NC · ~37 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Northlake House runs at 216% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Northlake House: 8.2 TCR = 216% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Northlake House safety composite

Northlake House scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 40%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 8.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Northlake House: 0.0 → 7.2 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 14.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0.44× in 2024

Northlake House's TCR rose 7.2 from 0.0 in 2016 to 7.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 14.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.44× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Charlotte, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.2 · 216% of ind

  • DART 3.6 DART
  • RANK #79/105
  • PHOTO Life Care Center San…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 24 inj
  • SIZE ~37 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Life Care Center Sandpoint (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Northlake House in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Northlake House averages 8.2 TCR (216% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Northlake House TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=5 · 2018=14.3 · 2019=8.6 · 2020=6.9 · 2021=12.6 · 2022=11.6 · 2023=7.5 · 2024=7.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Northlake House falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 40% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #79 safest of 105 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in North Carolina.

Northlake House (37 employees, TCR 8.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Northlake House
Northlake House (37 employees, TCR 8.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Northlake House has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.2 3.6 2 0 0
2023 7.5 2.5 3 0 0
2022 11.6 8.7 4 0 0
2021 12.6 3.1 4 0 0
2020 6.9 3.4 2 0 0
2019 8.6 2.9 3 0 0
2018 14.3 0.0 5 0 0
2017 5.0 0.0 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · NC · Charlotte

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 2,058 employers in Charlotte, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Life Care Center Sandpoint 8.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mission Ridge - A Division of St. John's United Billings 8.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR PACIFICA PARADISE VALLEY LLC 8.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Milestone Senior Living-Rhinelander 8.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE CAR Greenhouse LLC 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Statesville Breeders 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dan River CT/CC 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE hep Petra, LLC 37 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1101-Carolinas Medical Center (1101) 8,444 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0001-Carolinas Medical Center 8,032 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-AA-CLT-CHARLOTTE-CLT-TRML 7,295 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novant Health Presbyterian Medical Center 4,973 FTE
NAT-TCR Butler Ambulance Service Co. 8.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Keystone RV Company - Plant 311 8.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Community Options, Inc. 8.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Ambiente Sedona LLC 8.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Dekalb Tool & Die, Inc. 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dayton Construction Company, Inc. 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Peterbilt of Michigan, Inc. - Kalamazoo 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE ACS Temple Terrace 37 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.