Fire and flood restoration, single-family housing, general contractors · Wisconsin

Northland Restoration Group, LLC

Superior, WI · ~23 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Northland Restoration Group, LLC runs at 244% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Fire and flood restoration, single-family housing, general contractors workplace, earning a grade F.

Northland Restoration Group, LLC: 9.3 TCR = 244% of Fire and flood restoration, single-family housing, general contractors BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Northland Restoration Group, LLC safety composite

Northland Restoration Group, LLC scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

28/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

DART rate
F 9.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Northland Restoration Group, LLC: 4.5 → 14.0 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 14.0 TCR · DART/TCR 1.01× in 2024

Northland Restoration Group, LLC's TCR rose 9.5 from 4.5 in 2023 to 14.0 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.01× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236118 · Superior, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.3 · 244% of ind

  • DART 9.3 DART
  • RANK #22/32
  • PHOTO WES Construction
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: WES Construction (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Northland Restoration Group, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Northland Restoration Group, LLC averages 9.3 TCR (244% of the Fire and flood restoration, single-family housing, general contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Northland Restoration Group, LLC TCR series: 2023=4.5 · 2024=14 · BLS 3.8

Where Northland Restoration Group, LLC falls in its industry

698 Fire and flood restoration, si establishments

Safer than 29% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #22 safest of 32 Fire and flood restoration, si employers in Wisconsin.

Northland Restoration Group, LLC (23 employees, TCR 9.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 41 employees and a TCR of 6.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Northland Restoration Group, LLC
Northland Restoration Group, LLC (23 employees, TCR 9.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 41 employees and a TCR of 6.1

Northland Restoration Group, LLC has fewer employees than the Fire and flood restoration, single-famil median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 14.0 9.3 3 0 0
2023 4.5 4.5 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236118 · WI · Superior

698 Fire and flood restoration, single-family housing, general contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 80 employers in Superior, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR WES Construction 9.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR SERVPRO of Chesapeake 9.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cornerstone Restoration Services, LLC 9.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR E&N Associates, LLC 9.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE W3855 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Badger Unified Cooperative Services 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE 768 New Richmond Agronomy 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE 079 Evansville Agronomy 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR School District of Superior 1,033 FTE
CITY-NEAR Halvor Lines, Inc. Superior 747 FTE
CITY-NEAR Halvor Lines Superior Terminal 527 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lakehead Constructors, Inc. 474 FTE
NAT-TCR Virginia Beach Bickford 9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Clovis Glass Co., Inc. 9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR NY15530 9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR City of Roseville - Fire Department 9.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Metal Sales Manufacturing Corporation 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE AMECO USA Metal Fabrication Solutions, LLC 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Carter Lumber 390 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Carter Lumber 266 23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.