Pipe (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel · Oregon

Northwest Pipe Company - Portland

Portland, OR · ~60 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Northwest Pipe Company - Portland runs at 89% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Pipe (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel workplace, earning a grade C.

Northwest Pipe Company - Portland: 2.9 TCR = 89% of Pipe (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Northwest Pipe Company - Portland safety composite

Northwest Pipe Company - Portland scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 67% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 43%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.6

2018→2023

Northwest Pipe Company - Portland injury rate improved

Northwest Pipe Company - Portland's TCR fell 0.6 from 4.0 in 2018 to 3.4 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2018 at 4.0 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.76× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=4.0 · 2019=1.5 · 2023=3.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331210 · Portland, OR AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.9 · 89% of ind

  • DART 2.2 DART
  • RANK P67
  • PHOTO Prysmian Downhole Te…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~60 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Prysmian Downhole Technology - NJ (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Northwest Pipe Company - Portland in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Northwest Pipe Company - Portland averages 2.9 TCR (89% of the Pipe (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Northwest Pipe Company - Portland TCR series: 2018=4 · 2019=1.5 · 2023=3.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Northwest Pipe Company - Portland falls in its industry

329 Pipe (e.g., heavy riveted, loc establishments

Safer than 67% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Northwest Pipe Company - Portland (60 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Northwest Pipe Company - Portland
Northwest Pipe Company - Portland (60 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.3

Northwest Pipe Company - Portland has fewer employees than the Pipe (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, s median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 3.4 2.2 3 0 0
2019 1.5 0.0 1 0 0
2018 4.0 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331210 · OR · Portland

329 Pipe (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 1,728 employers in Portland, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Prysmian Downhole Technology - NJ 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ascent Tubular Products NC 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Skyline Steel 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Plymouth Tube Company- Eupora 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Microplant Nurseries Inc 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE OREGON BERRY PACKING INC. 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE McMinnville Water and Light 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rose City Renovation 60 FTE
CITY-NEAR OHSU Main Campus 18,003 FTE
CITY-NEAR OR349 PROVIDENCE ST VINCENT MEDICAL CTR-PORTLA 4,033 FTE
CITY-NEAR OR346 PROVIDENCE PORTLAND MEDICAL CTR-PORTLAND 3,684 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2252-00000530 3,498 FTE
NAT-TCR Rinker Houcp2 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Dc 0114 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR B03 Medcrest -Lithia Springs 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR PM Pediatrics-Turnersville 2.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Lawless, Inc. 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE Industrial Furnace Co, Inc 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE Martin Mechanical Contractors, Inc. 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE First Management, Inc. 60 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.