Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) · Connecticut

Norwich Public Utilities

Norwich, CT · ~145 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.3
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Norwich Public Utilities runs at 778% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) workplace, earning a grade F.

Norwich Public Utilities: 9.3 TCR = 778% of Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS 1.2 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Norwich Public Utilities safety composite

Norwich Public Utilities scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

18/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−12.2

2017→2024

Norwich Public Utilities injury rate improved

Norwich Public Utilities's TCR fell 12.2 from 17.3 in 2017 to 5.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 17.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.23× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=17.3 · 2018=14.7 · 2020=6.7 · 2021=10.8 · 2022=4.7 · 2023=6.0 · 2024=5.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Norwich, CT ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 9.3 · 778% of ind

  • DART 2.2 DART
  • RANK #7/7
  • PHOTO Construction - Sub &…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 78 inj
  • SIZE ~145 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Construction - Sub & Trans (0.3 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

Norwich Public Utilities in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Norwich Public Utilities averages 9.3 TCR (778% of the Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Norwich Public Utilities TCR series: 2017=17.3 · 2018=14.7 · 2020=6.7 · 2021=10.8 · 2022=4.7 · 2023=6 · 2024=5.1 · BLS 1.2

Where Norwich Public Utilities falls in its industry

846 Electric power generation, fos establishments

Safer than 1% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 7 Electric power generation, fos employers in Connecticut.

Norwich Public Utilities (145 employees, TCR 9.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Norwich Public Utilities
Norwich Public Utilities (145 employees, TCR 9.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Norwich Public Utilities has more employees than the Electric power generation, fossil fuel ( median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.1 2.2 7 0 0
2023 6.0 2.3 8 0 0
2022 4.7 2.3 6 0 0
2021 10.8 8.3 12 1 0
2020 6.7 3.7 9 0 0
2018 14.7 6.6 15 5 0
2017 17.3 7.2 21 3 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · CT · Norwich

846 Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 63 employers in Norwich, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Construction - Sub & Trans 9.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR GENERA CAMBALACHE 9.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Healy 8.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Golden Valley Electric Association, Healy 8.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Big Y Foods, Inc. Ellington 145 FTE
STATE-SIZE 100687 145 FTE
STATE-SIZE 100673 145 FTE
STATE-SIZE STOP & SHOP 100687 145 FTE
CITY-NEAR BACKUS HOSPITAL 1,819 FTE
CITY-NEAR The William W Backus Hospital 1,604 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Arc Eastern Connecticut 467 FTE
CITY-NEAR SNE Southern New England 329 FTE
NAT-TCR Blanchard Valley Residential Services, Inc - Campus 9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Misa Metal Processing Louisville, Kentucky 9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Antioch Health Center 9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR J&N Stone Inc 9.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bruker Nano Surfaces - Madison 145 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mehrer Drywall, Inc 145 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pegasus Schools, Inc. 145 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mittera Iowa 145 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.