Oil and gas field-type drilling machinery and equipment (except offshore floating platforms) manufacturing · Texas

NOV Rolligon Anderson

Anderson, TX · ~161 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

NOV Rolligon Anderson runs at 72% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Oil and gas field-type drilling machinery and equipment (except offshore floating platforms) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

NOV Rolligon Anderson: 2.4 TCR = 72% of Oil and gas field-type drilling machinery and equipment (except offshore floating platforms) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

NOV Rolligon Anderson safety composite

NOV Rolligon Anderson scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

28/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 2.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

NOV Rolligon Anderson held a steady TCR band

NOV Rolligon Anderson's TCR held near 0.2 from 1.9 in 2016 to 2.1 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2017 at 3.4 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.89× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.9 · 2017=3.4 · 2018=2.1 · 2019=2.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333132 · Anderson, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.4 · 72% of ind

  • DART 2.1 DART
  • RANK #171/208
  • PHOTO DynaEnergetics US In…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~161 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: DynaEnergetics US Inc. -Whitney, TX Machine Shop & Warehouse (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

NOV Rolligon Anderson in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows NOV Rolligon Anderson averages 2.4 TCR (72% of the Oil and gas field-type drilling machinery and equipment (except offshore floating platforms) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

NOV Rolligon Anderson TCR series: 2016=1.9 · 2017=3.4 · 2018=2.1 · 2019=2.1 · BLS 3.3

Where NOV Rolligon Anderson falls in its industry

316 Oil and gas field-type drillin establishments

Safer than 24% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #171 safest of 208 Oil and gas field-type drillin employers in Texas.

NOV Rolligon Anderson (161 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 1.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate NOV Rolligon Anderson
NOV Rolligon Anderson (161 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 1.3

NOV Rolligon Anderson has more employees than the Oil and gas field-type drilling machiner median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 2.1 2.1 4 0 0
2018 2.1 1.2 5 0 0
2017 3.4 3.4 7 0 0
2016 1.9 0.6 2 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333132 · TX · Anderson

316 Oil and gas field-type drilling machinery and equipment (except offshore floating platforms) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 4 employers in Anderson, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR DynaEnergetics US Inc. -Whitney, TX Machine Shop & Warehouse 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Derrick Corporation 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Geartech 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Innovex Downhole Solutions Midland OH 2.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Wildcat Oil Tools 161 FTE
STATE-SIZE Venegas Engineering Management & Construction, Inc. 161 FTE
STATE-SIZE Aries Buildings Systems 161 FTE
STATE-SIZE TransCore - T0574 - Houston CSC 161 FTE
CITY-NEAR NOV Rolligon 141 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rolligon 121 FTE
CITY-NEAR 7043 20 FTE
NAT-TCR P1AP 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR City of Lockport Police Department 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Visiting Nurses Home Care 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Solar Turbines Inc. DENY Office 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Camso Manufacturing USA, Ltd. 161 FTE
NAT-SIZE Presto Weyauwega 161 FTE
NAT-SIZE Emerson Resort 161 FTE
NAT-SIZE Applied Process Cooling Corporation 161 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.