Drug addiction rehabilitation facilities (except licensed hospitals), residential · Ohio

Nova Behavioral Health Inc

Dayton, OH · ~108 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Nova Behavioral Health Inc runs at 71% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Drug addiction rehabilitation facilities (except licensed hospitals), residential workplace, earning a grade B.

Nova Behavioral Health Inc: 2.7 TCR = 71% of Drug addiction rehabilitation facilities (except licensed hospitals), residential BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Nova Behavioral Health Inc safety composite

Nova Behavioral Health Inc scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.8

2016→2023

Nova Behavioral Health Inc injury rate improved

Nova Behavioral Health Inc's TCR fell 2.8 from 4.1 in 2016 to 1.3 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2016 at 4.1 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.49× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.1 · 2022=2.7 · 2023=1.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623220 · Dayton, OH AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.7 · 71% of ind

  • DART 1.3 DART
  • RANK #6/34
  • PHOTO Corydon Recovery LLC
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~108 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Corydon Recovery LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Nova Behavioral Health Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Nova Behavioral Health Inc averages 2.7 TCR (71% of the Drug addiction rehabilitation facilities (except licensed hospitals), residential BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Nova Behavioral Health Inc TCR series: 2016=4.1 · 2022=2.7 · 2023=1.3 · BLS 3.8

Where Nova Behavioral Health Inc falls in its industry

1,165 Drug addiction rehabilitation establishments

Safer than 70% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 34 Drug addiction rehabilitation employers in Ohio.

Nova Behavioral Health Inc (108 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Nova Behavioral Health Inc
Nova Behavioral Health Inc (108 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Nova Behavioral Health Inc has more employees than the Drug addiction rehabilitation facilities median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 1.3 1.3 1 0 0
2022 2.7 1.4 2 0 0
2016 4.1 0.0 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623220 · OH · Dayton

1,165 Drug addiction rehabilitation facilities (except licensed hospitals), residential employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 599 employers in Dayton, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Corydon Recovery LLC 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lehi Connects 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR R Wildwood 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 04-260 RENO ARP 2.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Central Egg Processing 108 FTE
STATE-SIZE LaRoche Tree Service, Inc. 108 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mielke Ohio 108 FTE
STATE-SIZE Decko Products, LLC 108 FTE
CITY-NEAR Miami Valley Hospital 6,862 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Dayton 5,359 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dayton Children's Hospital 3,590 FTE
CITY-NEAR CareSource Management Services LLC 3,172 FTE
NAT-TCR Mittera - Reno 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR USM Store #509 (United) 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Courtyard by Marriott Palo Alto Los Altos 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Standard Drywall, Inc. - Corona CA 2.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Halls Complete Rental Service Inc. 108 FTE
NAT-SIZE Grand Cove Nursing & Rehabilitation Center 108 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fiesta # 40 108 FTE
NAT-SIZE Collins Engine Nozzles Inc (Carroll IA) 108 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.