Pharmaceutical preparations (e.g., capsules, liniments, ointments, tablets) manufacturing · Texas

Nutraceutical System International

Austin, TX · ~169 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Nutraceutical System International runs at 180% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Pharmaceutical preparations (e.g., capsules, liniments, ointments, tablets) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Nutraceutical System International: 6.0 TCR = 180% of Pharmaceutical preparations (e.g., capsules, liniments, ointments, tablets) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Nutraceutical System International safety composite

Nutraceutical System International scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

19/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.2

2016→2019

Nutraceutical System International injury rate improved

Nutraceutical System International's TCR fell 4.2 from 10.3 in 2016 to 6.1 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2016 at 10.3 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.84× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=10.3 · 2017=3.3 · 2018=4.1 · 2019=6.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325412 · Austin, TX ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 6.0 · 180% of ind

  • DART 5.0 DART
  • RANK #40/44
  • PHOTO Wright Enrichment
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 37 inj
  • SIZE ~169 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Wright Enrichment (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Nutraceutical System International in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Nutraceutical System International averages 6.0 TCR (180% of the Pharmaceutical preparations (e.g., capsules, liniments, ointments, tablets) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Nutraceutical System International TCR series: 2016=10.3 · 2017=3.3 · 2018=4.1 · 2019=6.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Nutraceutical System International falls in its industry

855 Pharmaceutical preparations (e establishments

Safer than 9% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #40 safest of 44 Pharmaceutical preparations (e employers in Texas.

Nutraceutical System International (169 employees, TCR 6.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 171 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Nutraceutical System International
Nutraceutical System International (169 employees, TCR 6.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 171 employees and a TCR of 1.6

Nutraceutical System International has fewer employees than the Pharmaceutical preparations (e.g., capsu median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 6.1 5.0 11 0 0
2018 4.1 2.3 9 0 0
2017 3.3 0.0 5 0 0
2016 10.3 2.6 12 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325412 · TX · Austin

855 Pharmaceutical preparations (e.g., capsules, liniments, ointments, tablets) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 1,645 employers in Austin, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Wright Enrichment 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bimeda Irwindale 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR MED-PHARMEX INC - 2727 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Coloplast - Mankato 5.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE PYCO Industries Inc. 169 FTE
STATE-SIZE schoenmann produce company 169 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rumsey Construction Inc. 169 FTE
STATE-SIZE Reynolds asphalt and Construction Company 169 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ensign Services 11,325 FTE
CITY-NEAR NA-US-TX-Austin-Giga Texas 8,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6017-Loc: CORP LOC - US Austin 6,911 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6017-CORP LOC - USA UNITED STATES - AST 5,272 FTE
NAT-TCR JVS 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Meijer Store 287 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 4054-Abs 0021 3747 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Arby's 7601 6.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE KANPAKUS Manufacturing Penn Yan 169 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mechanical Tool & Engineering 169 FTE
NAT-SIZE BluRoc, LLC 169 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pennsylvania Power Company 169 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.