Warehousing (except farm products, general merchandise, refrigerated) · Tennessee

NuVasive, Inc. - Memphis

Memphis, TN · ~181 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

NuVasive, Inc. - Memphis runs at 14% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Warehousing (except farm products, general merchandise, refrigerated) workplace, earning a grade A.

NuVasive, Inc. - Memphis: 0.8 TCR = 14% of Warehousing (except farm products, general merchandise, refrigerated) BLS 5.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

NuVasive, Inc. - Memphis safety composite

NuVasive, Inc. - Memphis scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

75/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.7

2016→2021

NuVasive, Inc. - Memphis injury rate improved

NuVasive, Inc. - Memphis's TCR fell 1.7 from 1.7 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2016 at 1.7 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.7 · 2017=1.1 · 2018=0.6 · 2019=1.1 · 2020=0.6 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493190 · Memphis, TN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 14% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/14
  • PHOTO West Chester Visible
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~181 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: West Chester Visible (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

NuVasive, Inc. - Memphis in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows NuVasive, Inc. - Memphis averages 0.8 TCR (14% of the Warehousing (except farm products, general merchandise, refrigerated) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

NuVasive, Inc. - Memphis TCR series: 2016=1.7 · 2017=1.1 · 2018=0.6 · 2019=1.1 · 2020=0.6 · 2021=0 · BLS 5.8

Where NuVasive, Inc. - Memphis falls in its industry

453 Warehousing (except farm produ establishments

Safer than 86% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 14 Warehousing (except farm produ employers in Tennessee.

NuVasive, Inc. - Memphis (181 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate NuVasive, Inc. - Memphis
NuVasive, Inc. - Memphis (181 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 2.7

NuVasive, Inc. - Memphis has more employees than the Warehousing (except farm products, gener median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.6 0.6 1 0 0
2019 1.1 1.1 2 0 0
2018 0.6 0.6 1 0 0
2017 1.1 0.6 1 1 0
2016 1.7 0.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493190 · TN · Memphis

453 Warehousing (except farm products, general merchandise, refrigerated) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 1,330 employers in Memphis, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR West Chester Visible 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Associated Spring Raymond - Maumee 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tampa Terminal FL (2101 GATX Dr) (Tampa Area) 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR BPT Port Reading Terminal 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Reinhausen Manufacturing Inc. 181 FTE
STATE-SIZE Valeo Smyrna Site 181 FTE
STATE-SIZE Modine Manufacturing Company - Lawrenceburg 1 181 FTE
STATE-SIZE 3003 LOWE S OF S. CLARKSVILLE TN 181 FTE
CITY-NEAR FedEx 2903 SPRANKLE DR 12,398 FTE
CITY-NEAR 381940311 9,861 FTE
CITY-NEAR American Residential Services 5,775 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Jude Children's Research Hospital 5,599 FTE
NAT-TCR Angleboard 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR NPN Environmental Engineers, Inc. 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR HEADQ 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Continental Resources - Watford City, ND 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Electronics Plant 181 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wausau Container Division 181 FTE
NAT-SIZE Baesman group 181 FTE
NAT-SIZE Palo Alto Medical Foundation (378-98009) 181 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.