Assisted Living Facility for the Elderly · Minnesota

Oak Ridge Assisted Living of Hastings

Hastings, MN · ~37 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Oak Ridge Assisted Living of Hastings runs at 209% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted Living Facility for the Elderly workplace, earning a grade F.

Oak Ridge Assisted Living of Hastings: 8.0 TCR = 209% of Assisted Living Facility for the Elderly BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Oak Ridge Assisted Living of Hastings safety composite

Oak Ridge Assisted Living of Hastings scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 18%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

37/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 7.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Oak Ridge Assisted Living of Hastings: 6.0 → 14.8 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 14.8 TCR · DART/TCR 1.12× in 2024

Oak Ridge Assisted Living of Hastings's TCR rose 8.9 from 6.0 in 2020 to 14.8 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.12× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Hastings, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.0 · 209% of ind

  • DART 8.9 DART
  • RANK #134/240
  • PHOTO INDEPENDENCE COURT O…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~37 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: INDEPENDENCE COURT OF MONROEVILLE (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Oak Ridge Assisted Living of Hastings in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Oak Ridge Assisted Living of Hastings averages 8.0 TCR (209% of the Assisted Living Facility for the Elderly BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Oak Ridge Assisted Living of Hastings TCR series: 2020=6 · 2021=5.3 · 2022=8 · 2023=5.7 · 2024=14.8 · BLS 3.8

Where Oak Ridge Assisted Living of Hastings falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted Living Facility for t establishments

Safer than 45% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #134 safest of 240 Assisted Living Facility for t employers in Minnesota.

Oak Ridge Assisted Living of Hastings (37 employees, TCR 8.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Oak Ridge Assisted Living of Hastings
Oak Ridge Assisted Living of Hastings (37 employees, TCR 8.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Oak Ridge Assisted Living of Hastings has fewer employees than the Assisted Living Facility for the Elderly median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 14.8 8.9 5 0 0
2023 5.7 5.7 2 0 0
2022 8.0 8.0 2 1 0
2021 5.3 5.3 2 0 0
2020 6.0 3.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · MN · Hastings

6,510 Assisted Living Facility for the Elderly employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 72 employers in Hastings, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR INDEPENDENCE COURT OF MONROEVILLE 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR North Bay Retirement Community 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2248-60038 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Northbrook 8.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Betaseed Inc - Shakopee 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pals 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Supply Support 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Grand Rapids Public Utilities Commission 37 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dakota County 2,091 FTE
CITY-NEAR Regina Hospital (United Hastings Regina) 553 FTE
CITY-NEAR 610 AFTON ALPS 449 FTE
CITY-NEAR Regina Hospital 389 FTE
NAT-TCR Adams Heritage 8.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 1496 - Westborough 8.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 2569 - Las Vegas N Decatur 8.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 1426 - San Jose Capitol 8.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE DWM, Inc Latham, NY 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Machine Tool Engineering, Inc. 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE MBDA Incorporated - Huntsville 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE J&S Rug Log Cabin 37 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.