Apartment managers' offices · Iowa

Oakleaf Property Management

Sioux City, IA · ~65 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
4.3
Avg TCR
1.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Oakleaf Property Management runs at 306% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Apartment managers' offices workplace, earning a grade F.

Oakleaf Property Management: 4.3 TCR = 306% of Apartment managers' offices BLS 1.4 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Oakleaf Property Management safety composite

Oakleaf Property Management scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−11.6

2018→2024

Oakleaf Property Management injury rate improved

Oakleaf Property Management's TCR fell 11.6 from 11.6 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 11.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=11.6 · 2019=9.4 · 2020=4.2 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=1.6 · 2023=3.2 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 531311 · Sioux City, IA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 4.3 · 306% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/7
  • PHOTO Brett/Robinson Gulf …
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~65 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Brett/Robinson Gulf Corporation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Iowa employers → · Look up another →

Oakleaf Property Management in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Oakleaf Property Management averages 4.3 TCR (306% of the Apartment managers' offices BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Oakleaf Property Management TCR series: 2018=11.6 · 2019=9.4 · 2020=4.2 · 2021=0 · 2022=1.6 · 2023=3.2 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.4

Where Oakleaf Property Management falls in its industry

500 Apartment managers' offices establishments

Safer than 53% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Iowa alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 7 Apartment managers' offices employers in Iowa.

Oakleaf Property Management (65 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Oakleaf Property Management
Oakleaf Property Management (65 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Oakleaf Property Management has fewer employees than the Apartment managers' offices median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 3.2 1.6 2 0 0
2022 1.6 1.6 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 4.2 0.0 2 0 0
2019 9.4 2.4 4 0 0
2018 11.6 9.3 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

531311 · IA · Sioux City

500 Apartment managers' offices employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,192 rated employers in Iowa with headcount on file · 259 employers in Sioux City, IA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Brett/Robinson Gulf Corporation 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR RDM Management, Inc. 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rochester's Cornerstone Group, Ltd. 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Glen abbey Assisted Living & Memory Care 4.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE PDA Duane Arnold 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dubuque Operating Center 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE Forrest and Associate Inc 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cedar Rapids, IA/Quad Cities HVAC 65 FTE
CITY-NEAR Seaboard Triumph Foods 2,375 FTE
CITY-NEAR SeaboardTriumph Foods 1,896 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Luke's Regional Medical Center 1,201 FTE
CITY-NEAR Smithfield Packaged Meats Corp 691 FTE
NAT-TCR Carlsbad 2408 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Rio Grande Electric Cooperative, Inc. 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Pomfret Board of Education 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR BR11 Santa Rosa 4.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Healdsburg Branch 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE 30229 - CAPSTONE Kroger Compton CA 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE Commonwealth Senior Living at the Eastern Shore 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Shores of Lake Phalen 65 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.