Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · South Carolina

Oakleaf Village

Lexington, SC · ~57 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Oakleaf Village runs at 216% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Oakleaf Village: 8.2 TCR = 216% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Oakleaf Village safety composite

Oakleaf Village scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 43%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 8.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−15.1

2020→2024

Oakleaf Village injury rate improved

Oakleaf Village's TCR fell 15.1 from 18.5 in 2020 to 3.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 18.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.41× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=18.5 · 2021=8.7 · 2022=5.3 · 2023=5.2 · 2024=3.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Lexington, SC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.2 · 216% of ind

  • DART 3.4 DART
  • RANK #58/107
  • PHOTO SHERWOOD VILLAGE
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~57 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SHERWOOD VILLAGE (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Oakleaf Village in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Oakleaf Village averages 8.2 TCR (216% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Oakleaf Village TCR series: 2020=18.5 · 2021=8.7 · 2022=5.3 · 2023=5.2 · 2024=3.4 · BLS 3.8

Where Oakleaf Village falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 43% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #58 safest of 107 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in South Carolina.

Oakleaf Village (57 employees, TCR 8.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Oakleaf Village
Oakleaf Village (57 employees, TCR 8.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Oakleaf Village has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.4 3.4 2 0 0
2023 5.2 5.2 2 1 0
2022 5.3 5.3 3 0 0
2021 8.7 5.2 5 0 0
2020 18.5 16.8 5 6 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · SC · Lexington

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 136 employers in Lexington, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SHERWOOD VILLAGE 8.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR 10017 8.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Carriage Inn Huntsville 8.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR New Perspective - Mankato 8.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Allison-Smith Co. - South Carolina 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pageland 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Agru America Andrews 2 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE CKS Charleston 57 FTE
CITY-NEAR County of Lexington 1,630 FTE
CITY-NEAR Michelin US5 Lexington SC 1,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR Michelin North America US7 838 FTE
CITY-NEAR Columbia 760 FTE
NAT-TCR Store 0240 8.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 0567 8.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Bertram Yachts LLC. 8.2 TCR
NAT-TCR DL Martin Company East 8.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hadley General Contractors, Inc. 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Axios New Wales (Mosaic) 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rusnak Jaguar Land Rover Anaheim Hills 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Farmers Branch 57 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.