Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · California

Oakmont of Concord

Concord, CA · ~82 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Oakmont of Concord runs at 218% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Oakmont of Concord: 8.3 TCR = 218% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Oakmont of Concord safety composite

Oakmont of Concord scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

35/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 8.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

DART rate
F 9.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Oakmont of Concord: 7.9 → 10.6 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 24.3 TCR · DART/TCR 1.12× in 2024

Oakmont of Concord's TCR rose 2.7 from 7.9 in 2017 to 10.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 24.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.12× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Concord, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.3 · 218% of ind

  • DART 9.3 DART
  • RANK #255/635
  • PHOTO Augustana Emerald Cr…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 37 inj
  • SIZE ~82 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Augustana Emerald Crest #405 Burnsville (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Oakmont of Concord in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Oakmont of Concord averages 8.3 TCR (218% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Oakmont of Concord TCR series: 2017=7.9 · 2018=24.3 · 2019=3 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=12.2 · 2024=10.6 · BLS 3.8

Where Oakmont of Concord falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 42% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #255 safest of 635 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in California.

Oakmont of Concord (82 employees, TCR 8.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Oakmont of Concord
Oakmont of Concord (82 employees, TCR 8.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Oakmont of Concord has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 10.6 9.3 8 0 0
2023 12.2 9.5 8 1 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 3.0 1.5 2 0 0
2018 24.3 17.8 15 0 0
2017 7.9 0.0 4 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · CA · Concord

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 201 employers in Concord, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Augustana Emerald Crest #405 Burnsville 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wellington at NRH 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Residences at Deer Creek 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Santa Barbara 8.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE West Coast Harvesting Inc. 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE Farm 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wight Vineyard Management, Inc. 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE Growers Harvesting LLC 82 FTE
CITY-NEAR CA-01 4,525 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 403 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR AX9 Security Inc 1,725 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gonsalves and Santucci 1,551 FTE
NAT-TCR Mercy Rehab Hospital Oklahoma City South 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Milwaukee - Pipe 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Erie Materials Albany 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 3321 - Kips Bay 8.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE 5850 - Rocky Hill 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE Soil Installers 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE 5049 - Nashville 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE LTACH Morgantown, LLC (d/b/a Select Specialty Hospital - Morgantown) 82 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.