Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · California

Oakmont of Montecito

Concord, CA · ~117 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Oakmont of Montecito runs at 176% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Oakmont of Montecito: 6.7 TCR = 176% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Oakmont of Montecito safety composite

Oakmont of Montecito scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 54% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 45%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 6.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.1

2018→2024

Oakmont of Montecito injury rate improved

Oakmont of Montecito's TCR fell 6.1 from 11.0 in 2018 to 4.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 11.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.58× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=11.0 · 2022=3.9 · 2023=6.9 · 2024=4.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Concord, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 6.7 · 176% of ind

  • DART 3.9 DART
  • RANK #184/635
  • PHOTO Merrill Gardens at L…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 27 inj
  • SIZE ~117 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Merrill Gardens at Lafayette (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Oakmont of Montecito in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Oakmont of Montecito averages 6.7 TCR (176% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Oakmont of Montecito TCR series: 2018=11 · 2022=3.9 · 2023=6.9 · 2024=4.9 · BLS 3.8

Where Oakmont of Montecito falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 54% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #184 safest of 635 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in California.

Oakmont of Montecito (117 employees, TCR 6.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Oakmont of Montecito
Oakmont of Montecito (117 employees, TCR 6.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Oakmont of Montecito has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.9 3.9 5 0 0
2023 6.9 6.9 7 0 0
2022 3.9 3.9 4 0 0
2018 11.0 6.0 11 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · CA · Concord

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 201 employers in Concord, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Merrill Gardens at Lafayette 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Reflections Memory Care - Herrin 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2248-60037 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Heritage at Falmouth 6.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Frog Hollow Farm LLC 117 FTE
STATE-SIZE Standard Cattle LLC 117 FTE
STATE-SIZE LFA 117 FTE
STATE-SIZE Oxnard Plant #4 117 FTE
CITY-NEAR CA-01 4,525 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 403 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR AX9 Security Inc 1,725 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gonsalves and Santucci 1,551 FTE
NAT-TCR Van Goettling Masonry, Inc. 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Automation Tool & Die 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Discover Goodwill of Southern and Western Colorado- Ability One Laundry 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Transport Service 60129 Neville Island 6.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Avera Health Avera Sacred Heart Hospital Campus 117 FTE
NAT-SIZE Horizons, Inc 117 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ridgewood Healthcare LLC 117 FTE
NAT-SIZE Burgmeier Hauling - PA 117 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.