Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · California

Oakmont of Orange

Orange, CA · ~82 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
17.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Oakmont of Orange runs at 447% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Oakmont of Orange: 17.0 TCR = 447% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Oakmont of Orange safety composite

Oakmont of Orange scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 9%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 16.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Oakmont of Orange: 9.7 → 11.0 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 33.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0.24× in 2024

Oakmont of Orange's TCR rose 1.2 from 9.7 in 2018 to 11.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 33.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.24× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Orange, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 17.0 · 447% of ind

  • DART 4.1 DART
  • RANK #539/635
  • PHOTO Brookdale Niagara Me…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 48 inj
  • SIZE ~82 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Brookdale Niagara Memory Care (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Oakmont of Orange in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Oakmont of Orange averages 17.0 TCR (447% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Oakmont of Orange TCR series: 2018=9.7 · 2019=22.2 · 2021=33.3 · 2022=10.5 · 2023=15.2 · 2024=11 · BLS 3.8

Where Oakmont of Orange falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 9% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #539 safest of 635 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in California.

Oakmont of Orange (82 employees, TCR 17.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Oakmont of Orange
Oakmont of Orange (82 employees, TCR 17.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Oakmont of Orange has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 11.0 4.1 8 0 0
2023 15.2 6.9 11 0 0
2022 10.5 10.5 8 0 0
2021 33.3 33.3 3 14 0
2019 22.2 18.0 13 3 0
2018 9.7 5.8 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · CA · Orange

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 319 employers in Orange, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Niagara Memory Care 17.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mountain View Memory Care LLC 17.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Huntington Place 17.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Landings of Canton Hills 17.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE West Coast Harvesting Inc. 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE Farm 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wight Vineyard Management, Inc. 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE Growers Harvesting LLC 82 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Irvine Health 6,191 FTE
CITY-NEAR CHOC - CHildren's Hospital of Orange County 4,962 FTE
CITY-NEAR CHOC Children's Orange 3,693 FTE
CITY-NEAR CHOC Children's Orange V2 3,652 FTE
NAT-TCR Highway Department 17.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Arbors at Stow 17.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Brookdale Niagara Memory Care 17.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Eden Rehabilitation and Nursing 17.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE NJ VNA Cape May County 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE Legacy Building Solutions, Inc. 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE Philly Trans Orthodox Street 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE Newington Services, Inc. 82 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.