Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · South Carolina

Oaks at Daniel Island

Charleston, SC · ~25 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
17.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Oaks at Daniel Island runs at 452% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Oaks at Daniel Island: 17.2 TCR = 452% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Oaks at Daniel Island safety composite

Oaks at Daniel Island scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 8%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 17.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Oaks at Daniel Island: 8.4 → 26.0 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 26.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Oaks at Daniel Island's TCR rose 17.6 from 8.4 in 2023 to 26.0 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Charleston, SC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 17.2 · 452% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #97/107
  • PHOTO Spectrum Health Comp…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~25 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Spectrum Health Companies Virginia (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Oaks at Daniel Island in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Oaks at Daniel Island averages 17.2 TCR (452% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Oaks at Daniel Island TCR series: 2023=8.4 · 2024=26 · BLS 3.8

Where Oaks at Daniel Island falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 8% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #97 safest of 107 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in South Carolina.

Oaks at Daniel Island (25 employees, TCR 17.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Oaks at Daniel Island
Oaks at Daniel Island (25 employees, TCR 17.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Oaks at Daniel Island has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 26.0 0.0 2 0 0
2023 8.4 8.4 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · SC · Charleston

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 341 employers in Charleston, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Spectrum Health Companies Virginia 17.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sonata Delray Beach 17.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cornerstone at Hampton 17.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Avamere at sherwood 17.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Field Services Tech Building (Columbia) 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Clemson Operations Center 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fort Mill Operations Center 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Repairs 25 FTE
CITY-NEAR Medical University Hospital Authority 8,204 FTE
CITY-NEAR Medical University of South Carolina 5,881 FTE
CITY-NEAR SC-03 4,525 FTE
CITY-NEAR SAFETY MANAGEMENT DIVISION 1,790 FTE
NAT-TCR Sonata Delray Beach 17.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Modesto DC #089 17.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Commodity Forwarders Inc. (LAX-5814) 17.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Contract Delivery Services, Inc 17.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Quail Run Energy Center 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Millbrae Assisted Living LLC 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE 489 - Houston Frc 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hicks Striping & Curbing LLC 25 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.