Colleges, universities, and professional schools · Ohio

Oberlin College and Conservatory

Oberlin, OH · ~2,073 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
1.3
Avg TCR
1.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Oberlin College and Conservatory runs at 94% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Colleges, universities, and professional schools workplace, earning a grade C.

Oberlin College and Conservatory: 1.3 TCR = 94% of Colleges, universities, and professional schools BLS 1.4 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Oberlin College and Conservatory safety composite

Oberlin College and Conservatory scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 56% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 44%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Oberlin College and Conservatory held a steady TCR band

Oberlin College and Conservatory's TCR held near 0.2 from 0.8 in 2016 to 1.0 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2017 at 2.0 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.46× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.8 · 2017=2.0 · 2018=1.6 · 2019=1.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 611310 · Oberlin, OH AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade C · TCR 1.3 · 94% of ind

  • DART 0.6 DART
  • RANK #8/11
  • PHOTO 939 KANKAKEE COMMUNI…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 62 inj
  • SIZE ~2,073 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 939 KANKAKEE COMMUNITY COLLEGE (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Oberlin College and Conservatory in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Oberlin College and Conservatory averages 1.3 TCR (94% of the Colleges, universities, and professional schools BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Oberlin College and Conservatory TCR series: 2016=0.8 · 2017=2 · 2018=1.6 · 2019=1 · BLS 1.4

Where Oberlin College and Conservatory falls in its industry

347 Colleges, universities, and pr establishments

Safer than 56% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 11 Colleges, universities, and pr employers in Ohio.

Oberlin College and Conservatory (2,073 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 617 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,00010,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Oberlin College and Conservatory
Oberlin College and Conservatory (2,073 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 617 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Oberlin College and Conservatory has more employees than the Colleges, universities, and professional median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 1.0 0.6 11 0 0
2018 1.6 1.4 18 0 0
2017 2.0 1.6 23 1 0
2016 0.8 0.6 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

611310 · OH · Oberlin

347 Colleges, universities, and professional schools employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 20 employers in Oberlin, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 939 KANKAKEE COMMUNITY COLLEGE 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR LECOM Bradenton 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR LCC - East 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Eastern CT State University 1.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Mount Carmel West Hospital 2,085 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kenworth Truck Company 2,053 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cardinal Health South Campus 2,093 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fairfield Medical Center 2,049 FTE
CITY-NEAR Coram Flora 988 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 5309 309 FTE
CITY-NEAR 5309 287 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kendal at Oberlin 232 FTE
NAT-TCR Senior Housing Companies 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR PetersenDean Roofing and Solar West Sacramento-Solar 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Osburn Trucking and Pumping 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR BWE LLC, Springfield, Ma 1.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE 355831-Morgan Ny P&Dc 2,072 FTE
NAT-SIZE Caocs - Ontario Carrier Support 2,075 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ingram barge Company 2,071 FTE
NAT-SIZE Unity Point Health Trinity Rock Island 2,076 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.