Harvesting machinery and equipment, agriculture, merchant wholesalers · Indiana

Obermeyer Agri Group, Inc.

Greensburg, IN · ~22 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.2
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Obermeyer Agri Group, Inc. runs at 189% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Harvesting machinery and equipment, agriculture, merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade D.

Obermeyer Agri Group, Inc.: 4.2 TCR = 189% of Harvesting machinery and equipment, agriculture, merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Obermeyer Agri Group, Inc. safety composite

Obermeyer Agri Group, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 74% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.0

2018→2022

Obermeyer Agri Group, Inc. injury rate improved

Obermeyer Agri Group, Inc.'s TCR fell 4.0 from 8.3 in 2018 to 4.3 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2018 at 8.3 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=8.3 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=4.1 · 2022=4.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423820 · Greensburg, IN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.2 · 189% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #20/28
  • PHOTO C & B Operations Luv…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~22 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: C & B Operations Luverne (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Obermeyer Agri Group, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Obermeyer Agri Group, Inc. averages 4.2 TCR (189% of the Harvesting machinery and equipment, agriculture, merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Obermeyer Agri Group, Inc. TCR series: 2018=8.3 · 2020=0 · 2021=4.1 · 2022=4.3 · BLS 2.2

Where Obermeyer Agri Group, Inc. falls in its industry

700 Harvesting machinery and equip establishments

Safer than 51% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #20 safest of 28 Harvesting machinery and equip employers in Indiana.

Obermeyer Agri Group, Inc. (22 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 32 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Obermeyer Agri Group, Inc.
Obermeyer Agri Group, Inc. (22 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 32 employees and a TCR of 4.2

Obermeyer Agri Group, Inc. has fewer employees than the Harvesting machinery and equipment, agri median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 4.3 0.0 1 0 0
2021 4.1 4.1 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 8.3 8.3 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423820 · IN · Greensburg

700 Harvesting machinery and equipment, agriculture, merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 43 employers in Greensburg, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR C & B Operations Luverne 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Glencoe Store 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR 04-Batavia 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR American Implement, Inc. - Colby Dealership 4.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Wilson Fertilizer, Inc. 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE MISHAWAKA CONCRETE ASPHALT RECYCLE INC 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE MCAR 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Connersville District Office 22 FTE
CITY-NEAR Indiana Auto Plant 3,023 FTE
CITY-NEAR Honda Mfg. of Indiana, LLC 2,975 FTE
CITY-NEAR Valeo North America 824 FTE
CITY-NEAR Valeo Greensburg 638 FTE
NAT-TCR Empire Southwest, LLC - Blythe 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 482203-Dal-Bent Tree Sta 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Domino's Supply Chain Center- Kentucky 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Ordean East Middle School 4.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Novi plant 102 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Earthwood Custom Cabinetry 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hajoca Corporation - 740 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Colorado Hazard Control South Office 22 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.