Family restaurants, limited-service · California

OBO Italian Table and Bar

Sacramento, CA · ~52 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.5
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

OBO Italian Table and Bar runs at 218% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Family restaurants, limited-service workplace, earning a grade F.

OBO Italian Table and Bar: 6.5 TCR = 218% of Family restaurants, limited-service BLS 3.0 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

OBO Italian Table and Bar safety composite

OBO Italian Table and Bar scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

39/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 6.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

OBO Italian Table and Bar held a steady TCR band

OBO Italian Table and Bar's TCR held near 0.0 from 2.8 in 2017 to 2.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 18.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.43× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=2.8 · 2018=7.1 · 2019=2.9 · 2020=0.0 · 2022=18.1 · 2023=11.9 · 2024=2.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 722513 · Sacramento, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 6.5 · 218% of ind

  • DART 2.8 DART
  • RANK #149/264
  • PHOTO KFC-Windward #031
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~52 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: KFC-Windward #031 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

OBO Italian Table and Bar in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows OBO Italian Table and Bar averages 6.5 TCR (218% of the Family restaurants, limited-service BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

OBO Italian Table and Bar TCR series: 2017=2.8 · 2018=7.1 · 2019=2.9 · 2020=0 · 2022=18.1 · 2023=11.9 · 2024=2.8 · BLS 3.0

Where OBO Italian Table and Bar falls in its industry

1,014 Family restaurants, limited-se establishments

Safer than 35% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #149 safest of 264 Family restaurants, limited-se employers in California.

OBO Italian Table and Bar (52 employees, TCR 6.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 34 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate OBO Italian Table and Bar
OBO Italian Table and Bar (52 employees, TCR 6.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 34 employees and a TCR of 4.8

OBO Italian Table and Bar has more employees than the Family restaurants, limited-service median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.8 2.8 1 0 0
2023 11.9 11.9 4 0 0
2022 18.1 18.1 6 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.9 2.9 1 0 0
2018 7.1 7.1 2 0 0
2017 2.8 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

722513 · CA · Sacramento

1,014 Family restaurants, limited-service employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,348 employers in Sacramento, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR KFC-Windward #031 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sheridan #36 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Springfield Pie Inc 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wendy's Store #78 6.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Phil Foster Ranch 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Oceano Packing Company 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sun Pacific Farming | Citrus Farming | Ivanhoe 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brassfield Estate Vineyard 52 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Davis Health 10,481 FTE
CITY-NEAR Employment Development Department 8,494 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 451 5,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 485 5,500 FTE
NAT-TCR ECNY 6.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Duck Trap River of Maine 6.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Castle Danger Brewery 6.5 TCR
NAT-TCR At Home Stores #169 6.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Grand Rapids Transport Inc., 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Truswood Inc - Raleigh Division 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Macedonia Middle School 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Golf Acquisition Group 52 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.