Envelope paper, bulk, merchant wholesalers · Arkansas

O'Connor Distributing- Three Rivers Division

Pine Bluff, AR · ~28 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
4.5
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

O'Connor Distributing- Three Rivers Division runs at 204% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Envelope paper, bulk, merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade F.

O'Connor Distributing- Three Rivers Division: 4.5 TCR = 204% of Envelope paper, bulk, merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

O'Connor Distributing- Three Rivers Division safety composite

O'Connor Distributing- Three Rivers Division scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 74% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 12%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.9

2018→2023

O'Connor Distributing- Three Rivers Division injury rate improved

O'Connor Distributing- Three Rivers Division's TCR fell 6.9 from 6.9 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2019 at 16.6 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=6.9 · 2019=16.6 · 2020=3.4 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 424110 · Pine Bluff, AR ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 4.5 · 204% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK P12
  • PHOTO CMP
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~28 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CMP (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arkansas employers → · Look up another →

O'Connor Distributing- Three Rivers Division in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows O'Connor Distributing- Three Rivers Division averages 4.5 TCR (204% of the Envelope paper, bulk, merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

O'Connor Distributing- Three Rivers Division TCR series: 2018=6.9 · 2019=16.6 · 2020=3.4 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 2.2

Where O'Connor Distributing- Three Rivers Division falls in its industry

116 Envelope paper, bulk, merchant establishments

Safer than 12% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
O'Connor Distributing- Three Rivers Division (28 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 46 employees and a TCR of 2.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate O'Connor Distributing- Three Rivers Division
O'Connor Distributing- Three Rivers Division (28 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 46 employees and a TCR of 2.2

O'Connor Distributing- Three Rivers Division has fewer employees than the Envelope paper, bulk, merchant wholesale median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 3.4 3.4 1 0 0
2019 16.6 16.6 5 0 0
2018 6.9 6.9 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

424110 · AR · Pine Bluff

116 Envelope paper, bulk, merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,393 rated employers in Arkansas with headcount on file · 78 employers in Pine Bluff, AR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CMP 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lindenmeyr Central Islip 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Case Makes 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Packaging North 4.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Timber Logistics, Inc. 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Grannis/Broken Bow Growout 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Today's Power, Inc. 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE LSC Arkansas 28 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pine Bluff Jeff Pkwy Plant 1,709 FTE
CITY-NEAR Evergreen Packaging - Pine Bluff 1,024 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saracen Casino Resort 655 FTE
CITY-NEAR 3331 505 FTE
NAT-TCR Stueve Construction LLC (All Locations) 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Hoppe Technologies, Inc 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Mar-Jac Poultry, Inc Feed Mill 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR ASAP Express 4.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Platinum Cleaning - Hertz Brookhollow 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brookdale North Glendale 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE MRC Management Services 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Keller Warehousing Mattoon 28 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.