Transmissions and parts, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing · Ohio

Oerlikon Friction Systems (US) Inc

Dayton, OH · ~108 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.5
Avg TCR
5.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Oerlikon Friction Systems (US) Inc runs at 28% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Transmissions and parts, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Oerlikon Friction Systems (US) Inc: 1.5 TCR = 28% of Transmissions and parts, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing BLS 5.4 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Oerlikon Friction Systems (US) Inc safety composite

Oerlikon Friction Systems (US) Inc scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 74% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 24%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Oerlikon Friction Systems (US) Inc: 0.0 → 3.0 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 3.0 TCR · DART/TCR 2.01× in 2023

Oerlikon Friction Systems (US) Inc's TCR rose 3.0 from 0.0 in 2022 to 3.0 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 2.01× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336350 · Dayton, OH AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.5 · 28% of ind

  • DART 3.0 DART
  • RANK #9/28
  • PHOTO Sterling Plant
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~108 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Sterling Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Oerlikon Friction Systems (US) Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Oerlikon Friction Systems (US) Inc averages 1.5 TCR (28% of the Transmissions and parts, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Oerlikon Friction Systems (US) Inc TCR series: 2022=0 · 2023=3 · BLS 5.4

Where Oerlikon Friction Systems (US) Inc falls in its industry

320 Transmissions and parts, autom establishments

Safer than 74% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 28 Transmissions and parts, autom employers in Ohio.

Oerlikon Friction Systems (US) Inc (108 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 200 employees and a TCR of 2.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Oerlikon Friction Systems (US) Inc
Oerlikon Friction Systems (US) Inc (108 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 200 employees and a TCR of 2.9

Oerlikon Friction Systems (US) Inc has fewer employees than the Transmissions and parts, automotive, tru median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 3.0 3.0 3 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336350 · OH · Dayton

320 Transmissions and parts, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 599 employers in Dayton, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Sterling Plant 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hillside 3 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR GKN Automotive- Alamance 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tri Component Products 1.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Central Egg Processing 108 FTE
STATE-SIZE LaRoche Tree Service, Inc. 108 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mielke Ohio 108 FTE
STATE-SIZE Decko Products, LLC 108 FTE
CITY-NEAR Miami Valley Hospital 6,862 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Dayton 5,359 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dayton Children's Hospital 3,590 FTE
CITY-NEAR CareSource Management Services LLC 3,172 FTE
NAT-TCR Harris Steel Erectors, Inc. 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR SouthernCarlson - Carter Lake 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Land of Lincoln Goodwill Chatham Store 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Central MN Mental Health Center - Waite Park 1.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Afsco Fence Supply Company, Inc. 108 FTE
NAT-SIZE Content Critical Solutions - New Jersey 108 FTE
NAT-SIZE As2 - Assessor 108 FTE
NAT-SIZE KB Home Southbay 108 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.