Police departments (except American Indian or Alaska Native) · Michigan

Office of Field Operations - Detroit

Detroit, MI · ~1,509 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.3
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Office of Field Operations - Detroit runs at 134% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Police departments (except American Indian or Alaska Native) workplace, earning a grade D.

Office of Field Operations - Detroit: 4.3 TCR = 134% of Police departments (except American Indian or Alaska Native) BLS 3.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Office of Field Operations - Detroit safety composite

Office of Field Operations - Detroit scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 85% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 4.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

DART rate
B 1.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Office of Field Operations - Detroit: 4.0 → 4.6 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 4.6 TCR · DART/TCR 0.33× in 2018

Office of Field Operations - Detroit's TCR rose 0.6 from 4.0 in 2016 to 4.6 in 2018. In 2018, DART was 0.33× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 922120 · Detroit, MI ABOVE-IND · LARGE

Grade D · TCR 4.3 · 134% of ind

  • DART 1.4 DART
  • RANK #4/33
  • PHOTO Juneau Police Depart…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 120 inj
  • SIZE ~1,509 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Juneau Police Department (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Office of Field Operations - Detroit in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Office of Field Operations - Detroit averages 4.3 TCR (134% of the Police departments (except American Indian or Alaska Native) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Office of Field Operations - Detroit TCR series: 2016=4 · 2018=4.6 · BLS 3.2

Where Office of Field Operations - Detroit falls in its industry

716 Police departments (except Ame establishments

Safer than 85% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 9.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 33 Police departments (except Ame employers in Michigan.

Office of Field Operations - Detroit (1,509 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 95 employees and a TCR of 9.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Office of Field Operations - Detroit
Office of Field Operations - Detroit (1,509 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 95 employees and a TCR of 9.5

Office of Field Operations - Detroit has more employees than the Police departments (except American Indi median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 9.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 4.6 1.4 69 5 0
2016 4.0 0.7 51 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

922120 · MI · Detroit

716 Police departments (except American Indian or Alaska Native) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 673 employers in Detroit, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Juneau Police Department 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR LVMPD - DSD 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Orlando PDC 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR City of Anaheim, Orange County Family Justice Center 4.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE US MI Zeeland Centennial 1,511 FTE
STATE-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - DTW5 1,512 FTE
STATE-SIZE DENSO International America, inc. 1,503 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Henry Ford 1,519 FTE
CITY-NEAR Henry Ford Hospital 8,838 FTE
CITY-NEAR Detroit Campus 8,632 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - DTW 6,640 FTE
CITY-NEAR General Motors Corporation 5,241 FTE
NAT-TCR DSOK Oklahoma 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Roses 365 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR AG Machining 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Hickory Center (Nchik) 4.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Casac - Sacramento Hub 1,509 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dal-Flight Ops 1,509 FTE
NAT-SIZE Porter Hospital LLC 1,509 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - MDW5 1,509 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.