Police departments (except American Indian or Alaska Native) · Texas

Office of Field Operations - Houston

Houston, TX · ~1,519 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.1
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Office of Field Operations - Houston runs at 159% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Police departments (except American Indian or Alaska Native) workplace, earning a grade D.

Office of Field Operations - Houston: 5.1 TCR = 159% of Police departments (except American Indian or Alaska Native) BLS 3.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Office of Field Operations - Houston safety composite

Office of Field Operations - Houston scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

72/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 5.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

DART rate
B 1.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.3

2016→2018

Office of Field Operations - Houston injury rate improved

Office of Field Operations - Houston's TCR fell 3.3 from 6.7 in 2016 to 3.5 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 6.7 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.25× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.7 · 2018=3.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 922120 · Houston, TX ABOVE-IND · LARGE

Grade D · TCR 5.1 · 159% of ind

  • DART 1.3 DART
  • RANK #2/9
  • PHOTO Ramsey County Sherif…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 142 inj
  • SIZE ~1,519 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ramsey County Sheriff's Department (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Office of Field Operations - Houston in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Office of Field Operations - Houston averages 5.1 TCR (159% of the Police departments (except American Indian or Alaska Native) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Office of Field Operations - Houston TCR series: 2016=6.7 · 2018=3.5 · BLS 3.2

Where Office of Field Operations - Houston falls in its industry

716 Police departments (except Ame establishments

Safer than 79% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 9.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 9 Police departments (except Ame employers in Texas.

Office of Field Operations - Houston (1,519 employees, TCR 5.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 95 employees and a TCR of 9.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Office of Field Operations - Houston
Office of Field Operations - Houston (1,519 employees, TCR 5.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 95 employees and a TCR of 9.5

Office of Field Operations - Houston has more employees than the Police departments (except American Indi median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 9.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 3.5 1.3 62 0 0
2016 6.7 2.0 80 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

922120 · TX · Houston

716 Police departments (except American Indian or Alaska Native) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 5,116 employers in Houston, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ramsey County Sheriff's Department 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR City of Rockville Police 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Village of Hinsdale Police Department 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR City of Madisonville - Police 5.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Thomson Reuters - Carrollton 1,520 FTE
STATE-SIZE Texas Health Southwest 1,518 FTE
STATE-SIZE Baylor Scott & White Medical Center - Hillcrest 1,512 FTE
STATE-SIZE 954 NORTH CENTRAL BAPTIST HOSPITAL 1,512 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH IAH 11,560 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH - Airport United Airlines Offices 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-IAH 9,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR Houston Methodist Hospital Texas Medical Center 8,873 FTE
NAT-TCR Big Lots Store #5139 N. Charleston, 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR InfuScience, Inc. - Charleston, SC - 2415 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Preferred Laundry Service 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 0080 - Lafayette, La 5.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Automotive Plant 1,519 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0559 - Indianapolis DC 1,519 FTE
NAT-SIZE Homestead Baptist Health 1,519 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Henry Ford 1,519 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.