Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Ohio

Ohio Living - Greater Youngstown

Canfield, OH · ~70 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ohio Living - Greater Youngstown runs at 87% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade C.

Ohio Living - Greater Youngstown: 3.3 TCR = 87% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ohio Living - Greater Youngstown safety composite

Ohio Living - Greater Youngstown scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

75/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 3.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Ohio Living - Greater Youngstown held a steady TCR band

Ohio Living - Greater Youngstown's TCR held near 0.0 from 1.6 in 2021 to 1.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 6.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=1.6 · 2022=6.6 · 2023=3.3 · 2024=1.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Canfield, OH AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.3 · 87% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #64/243
  • PHOTO Brookdale San Marcos…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~70 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Brookdale San Marcos South (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Ohio Living - Greater Youngstown in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ohio Living - Greater Youngstown averages 3.3 TCR (87% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ohio Living - Greater Youngstown TCR series: 2021=1.6 · 2022=6.6 · 2023=3.3 · 2024=1.6 · BLS 3.8

Where Ohio Living - Greater Youngstown falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 83% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #64 safest of 243 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Ohio.

Ohio Living - Greater Youngstown (70 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Ohio Living - Greater Youngstown
Ohio Living - Greater Youngstown (70 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Ohio Living - Greater Youngstown has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.6 0.0 1 0 0
2023 3.3 0.0 2 0 0
2022 6.6 1.7 4 0 0
2021 1.6 1.6 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · OH · Canfield

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 36 employers in Canfield, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Brookdale San Marcos South 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Glenwood of Mahomet 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Corcoran House Assisted Living 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 10400 3.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Trillium Farms Layer 3 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kellogg Ave Operations Facility 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE Alvada Const. Co, Inc.- ACI 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE Matrix5 Site Development 70 FTE
CITY-NEAR Howlett Restaurant Group 301 FTE
CITY-NEAR Star Extruded Shapes Inc. 181 FTE
CITY-NEAR Giant Eagle #6385 168 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baird Brothers Saw Mill Inc. 126 FTE
NAT-TCR NA-US-IL-Chicago-Elston 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR doTERRA Manufacturing 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Meyer Steel Drum DBA Mauser Packaging Solutions 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Prime Now LLC - UGA2 3.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Universal Plastics 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE RidgeLine Direct Inc. 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jay Wolfe Imports LLC (Honda) 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE Doorstep Delivery Solutions 70 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.