Chickens, processing, fresh, frozen, canned, or cooked (except baby and pet food) · Arkansas

OKF Risk Management

Name: OKF Risk Management Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Fort Smith, AR · ~17 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

B
Good Safety Record: 2.3
Avg TCR: 3.3
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

OKF Risk Management runs at 70% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Chickens, processing, fresh, frozen, canned, or cooked (except baby and pet food) workplace, earning a grade B.

OKF Risk Management: 2.3 TCR = 70% of Chickens, processing, fresh, frozen, canned, or cooked (except baby and pet food) BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

OKF Risk Management safety composite

OKF Risk Management scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 95% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 54%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

75/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): C 2.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers
DART rate: A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 95% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.6

2017→2018

OKF Risk Management injury rate improved

OKF Risk Management's TCR fell 4.6 from 4.6 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 4.6 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=4.6 · 2018=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311615 · Fort Smith, AR AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.3 · 70% of ind

DART 0.0 DART
RANK #20/69
PHOTO PROCESSING PLANT POU…
BOOK 2y book
INJ 1 inj
SIZE ~17 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: PROCESSING PLANT POULTRY / KILL -PILGRIMS (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arkansas employers → · Look up another →

This site

2.3
PROCESSING PLA

2.3
Koch Foods Deb

2.3
Cornelia Plant

2.3
Millsboro Proc

2.3

What this shows OKF Risk Management averages 2.3 TCR (70% of the Chickens, processing, fresh, frozen, canned, or cooked (except baby and pet food) BLS benchmark).

OKF Risk Management TCR series: 2017=4.6 · 2018=0 · BLS 3.3

Where OKF Risk Management falls in its industry

509 Chickens, processing, fresh, f establishments

Safer than 70% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

Grade B

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arkansas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #20 safest of 69 Chickens, processing, fresh, f employers in Arkansas.

OKF Risk Management (17 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 619 employees and a TCR of 3.5

OKF Risk Management has fewer employees than the Chickens, processing, fresh, frozen, can median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses	Fatalities
2018	0.0	0.0	0	0	0
2017	4.6	4.6	1	0	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311615 · AR · Fort Smith

509 Chickens, processing, fresh, frozen, canned, or cooked (except baby and pet food) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,393 rated employers in Arkansas with headcount on file · 249 employers in Fort Smith, AR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	PROCESSING PLANT POULTRY / KILL -PILGRIMS	CHATTANOOGA, TN	2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Koch Foods Debone	MORRISTOWN, TN	2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Cornelia Plant	CORNELIA, GA	2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Millsboro Processing	MILLSBORO, DE	2.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Wynne Division	WYNNE	17 FTE
STATE-SIZE	CenterPoint Energy - Monticello	MONTICELLO	17 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Wagner General Contractors, Inc., AR	SEARCY	17 FTE
STATE-SIZE	LSAM J2BP Jonesboro	JONESBORO	17 FTE
CITY-NEAR	MERCY HOSPITAL FORT SMITH	Fort Smith	1,944 FTE
CITY-NEAR	ABB Motors and Mechanical, Inc. - Fort Smith	Fort Smith	1,298 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Fort Smith - 5713 RS Boreham Jr Street	Fort Smith	985 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Baptist Health Medical Center - Fort Smith	Fort Smith	970 FTE
NAT-TCR	Kci Rac	Kansas City, MO	2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR	6 Executive Plaza	Yonkers, NY	2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR	Napoleon Harley-Davidson	Napoleon, OH	2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR	Elite Metal Decking Inc.	Riviera Beach, FL	2.3 TCR

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.