Cutting, engraving, etching, painting or polishing purchased glass · Indiana

Oldcastle BuildingEnvelope Indianapolis

Indianapolis, IN · ~95 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Oldcastle BuildingEnvelope Indianapolis runs at 31% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Cutting, engraving, etching, painting or polishing purchased glass workplace, earning a grade A.

Oldcastle BuildingEnvelope Indianapolis: 1.0 TCR = 31% of Cutting, engraving, etching, painting or polishing purchased glass BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Oldcastle BuildingEnvelope Indianapolis safety composite

Oldcastle BuildingEnvelope Indianapolis scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 90% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

69/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 90% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Oldcastle BuildingEnvelope Indianapolis: 0.0 → 1.9 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 1.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.96× in 2018

Oldcastle BuildingEnvelope Indianapolis's TCR rose 1.9 from 0.0 in 2016 to 1.9 in 2018. In 2018, DART was 0.96× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 327215 · Indianapolis, IN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.0 · 31% of ind

  • DART 1.0 DART
  • RANK #1/21
  • PHOTO ProVia Baltic Facility
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~95 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ProVia Baltic Facility (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Oldcastle BuildingEnvelope Indianapolis in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Oldcastle BuildingEnvelope Indianapolis averages 1.0 TCR (31% of the Cutting, engraving, etching, painting or polishing purchased glass BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Oldcastle BuildingEnvelope Indianapolis TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=1.1 · 2018=1.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Oldcastle BuildingEnvelope Indianapolis falls in its industry

441 Cutting, engraving, etching, p establishments

Safer than 90% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 21 Cutting, engraving, etching, p employers in Indiana.

Oldcastle BuildingEnvelope Indianapolis (95 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 94 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Oldcastle BuildingEnvelope Indianapolis
Oldcastle BuildingEnvelope Indianapolis (95 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 94 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Oldcastle BuildingEnvelope Indianapolis has more employees than the Cutting, engraving, etching, painting or median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 1.9 1.0 2 0 0
2017 1.1 0.0 0 1 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

327215 · IN · Indianapolis

441 Cutting, engraving, etching, painting or polishing purchased glass employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 2,074 employers in Indianapolis, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ProVia Baltic Facility 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR OBE - Battle Ground 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Trulite Glass & Aluminum 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Oldcastle BuildingEnvelope - Miami OBE 1.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE 357-NiSource-Valparaiso Central Stores 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fetters Construction Inc 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE Biehle Electric, Inc. 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE Comfort Sytems USA Strategic Accounts 95 FTE
CITY-NEAR Indiana University Health, Inc 7,874 FTE
CITY-NEAR Methodist Hospital 6,862 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eli Lilly - Lilly Corp Center 6,482 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lilly Technology Center 6,472 FTE
NAT-TCR BT Buffalo Grove 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR CA.SACRA.2 - Ricoh Usa, Inc. 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR GA099 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Starcraft Interior Contractors Ltd 1.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE the Melanson company,inc 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE Houston - 202 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE Heartland Health Care Center - Battlecreek 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE Valence Surface Technologies Eastman Operations 95 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.