Motor freight carrier, general, long-distance, truckload (TL) · Mississippi

Olive Branch, MS (WC TT MMEM)

Olive Branch, MS · ~67 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.7
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Olive Branch, MS (WC TT MMEM) runs at 59% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Motor freight carrier, general, long-distance, truckload (TL) workplace, earning a grade B.

Olive Branch, MS (WC TT MMEM): 2.7 TCR = 59% of Motor freight carrier, general, long-distance, truckload (TL) BLS 4.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Olive Branch, MS (WC TT MMEM) safety composite

Olive Branch, MS (WC TT MMEM) scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 64% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.4

2016→2021

Olive Branch, MS (WC TT MMEM) injury rate improved

Olive Branch, MS (WC TT MMEM)'s TCR fell 0.4 from 1.6 in 2016 to 1.1 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2019 at 6.7 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.43× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.6 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=1.6 · 2019=6.7 · 2020=5.0 · 2021=1.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484121 · Olive Branch, MS AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.7 · 59% of ind

  • DART 1.1 DART
  • RANK #26/44
  • PHOTO Lockbourne, OH - Ash…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~67 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Lockbourne, OH - Ashville Pike (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Mississippi employers → · Look up another →

Olive Branch, MS (WC TT MMEM) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Olive Branch, MS (WC TT MMEM) averages 2.7 TCR (59% of the Motor freight carrier, general, long-distance, truckload (TL) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Olive Branch, MS (WC TT MMEM) TCR series: 2016=1.6 · 2017=0 · 2018=1.6 · 2019=6.7 · 2020=5 · 2021=1.1 · BLS 4.5

Where Olive Branch, MS (WC TT MMEM) falls in its industry

3,252 Motor freight carrier, general establishments

Safer than 56% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Mississippi alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #26 safest of 44 Motor freight carrier, general employers in Mississippi.

Olive Branch, MS (WC TT MMEM) (67 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Olive Branch, MS (WC TT MMEM)
Olive Branch, MS (WC TT MMEM) (67 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Olive Branch, MS (WC TT MMEM) has more employees than the Motor freight carrier, general, long-dis median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 1.1 1.1 1 0 0
2020 5.0 3.3 3 0 0
2019 6.7 5.0 4 0 0
2018 1.6 1.6 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 1.6 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484121 · MS · Olive Branch

3,252 Motor freight carrier, general, long-distance, truckload (TL) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,083 rated employers in Mississippi with headcount on file · 154 employers in Olive Branch, MS · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Lockbourne, OH - Ashville Pike 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Deep South Freight 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR PA-Tunkhannock 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Midwest Carriers 2.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sanderson Farms McComb Hatchery 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE Coast Division Office & MDC 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE Singing River Electric Cooperative - Gautier Office 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE Carnes Frames Inc. Plant #2 67 FTE
CITY-NEAR 8807751-WILLIAMS SONOMA OLIVE BRANCH OB2 2,549 FTE
CITY-NEAR Olive Branch 2,169 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6458-OLIV 1,727 FTE
CITY-NEAR Olive Branch 2 1,580 FTE
NAT-TCR UniCarriers Americas 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR The Mitographers, Inc. 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 151 Denver Gallery 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Bonded Lightning Protection Systems, Ltd. 2.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Dollar General (WC USX DIN) 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE Retama Manor Nursing Center/McAllen 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE TUS - Ground Ops 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE CN - South Philadelphia 67 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.