Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction · Oregon

Olsson Industrial Electric

Springfield, OR · ~223 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Olsson Industrial Electric runs at 21% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction workplace, earning a grade A.

Olsson Industrial Electric: 0.6 TCR = 21% of Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction BLS 2.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Olsson Industrial Electric safety composite

Olsson Industrial Electric scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

75/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.8

2016→2024

Olsson Industrial Electric injury rate improved

Olsson Industrial Electric's TCR fell 1.8 from 1.8 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 1.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.8 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · Springfield, OR AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 21% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/28
  • PHOTO Hudson Trenching Ser…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~223 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hudson Trenching Service, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Olsson Industrial Electric in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Olsson Industrial Electric averages 0.6 TCR (21% of the Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Olsson Industrial Electric TCR series: 2016=1.8 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Olsson Industrial Electric falls in its industry

1,605 Utility line (i.e., communicat establishments

Safer than 87% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 28 Utility line (i.e., communicat employers in Oregon.

Olsson Industrial Electric (223 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Olsson Industrial Electric
Olsson Industrial Electric (223 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Olsson Industrial Electric has more employees than the Utility line (i.e., communication, elect median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 1.8 0.6 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · OR · Springfield

1,605 Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 151 employers in Springfield, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hudson Trenching Service, Inc. 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 104297 - Rosewater Wind Farm 100MW 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pinnacle Power Services Inc 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Allied Power Services - Exelon, LaSalle Station 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE 6284-YR-875 RX 223 FTE
STATE-SIZE Portland-Main 223 FTE
STATE-SIZE Multnomah County Bldg 414/Elections 223 FTE
STATE-SIZE DESCHUTES BREWERY 222 FTE
CITY-NEAR SHMC at Riverbend 3,288 FTE
CITY-NEAR Riverbend Annex 457 FTE
CITY-NEAR 3239 376 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 3239 374 FTE
NAT-TCR Profire & Water Restoration 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Central Paving Co. 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Equipment Depot Northeast, Inc. - Wilmington 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Performance Pipelining INC 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ability Building Community 223 FTE
NAT-SIZE Deublin Company 223 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ameripack Foods LLC 223 FTE
NAT-SIZE 55th Street Center 223 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.