Offset printing (except books, printing grey goods) · Nebraska

Omaha Printing Company

Omaha, NE · ~77 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Omaha Printing Company runs at 159% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Offset printing (except books, printing grey goods) workplace, earning a grade D.

Omaha Printing Company: 5.3 TCR = 159% of Offset printing (except books, printing grey goods) BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Omaha Printing Company safety composite

Omaha Printing Company scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 9%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

22/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Omaha Printing Company: 3.4 → 7.8 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 8.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0.99× in 2024

Omaha Printing Company's TCR rose 4.5 from 3.4 in 2017 to 7.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 8.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.99× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 323111 · Omaha, NE ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.3 · 159% of ind

  • DART 5.2 DART
  • RANK #12/15
  • PHOTO NovaCopy - Nashville
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~77 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: NovaCopy - Nashville (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Nebraska employers → · Look up another →

Omaha Printing Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Omaha Printing Company averages 5.3 TCR (159% of the Offset printing (except books, printing grey goods) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Omaha Printing Company TCR series: 2017=3.4 · 2018=3.9 · 2019=5.2 · 2020=7.5 · 2021=8.2 · 2022=0.4 · 2023=5.8 · 2024=7.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Omaha Printing Company falls in its industry

2,001 Offset printing (except books, establishments

Safer than 15% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Nebraska alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 15 Offset printing (except books, employers in Nebraska.

Omaha Printing Company (77 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Omaha Printing Company
Omaha Printing Company (77 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Omaha Printing Company has more employees than the Offset printing (except books, printing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.8 5.2 4 2 0
2023 5.8 1.2 1 4 0
2022 0.4 0.4 3 0 0
2021 8.2 4.7 4 3 0
2020 7.5 2.5 3 3 0
2019 5.2 1.3 3 1 0
2018 3.9 1.3 1 2 0
2017 3.4 0.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

323111 · NE · Omaha

2,001 Offset printing (except books, printing grey goods) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 3,594 rated employers in Nebraska with headcount on file · 1,135 employers in Omaha, NE · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR NovaCopy - Nashville 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR ECM Print 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR DARWILL MCCOOK 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Searcy Facility 5.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Tuls Dairy Butler County Dairy LLC 77 FTE
STATE-SIZE Boone Brothers Roofing 77 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sioux City Foundry Co 77 FTE
STATE-SIZE US Foods Grand Island 77 FTE
CITY-NEAR Drivers Management LLC/Over the Road Drivers 9,373 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nebraska Medicine 8,728 FTE
CITY-NEAR FUSION MEDICAL STAFFING, LLC 2,874 FTE
CITY-NEAR 61830001 METHODIST HOSPITAL 2,861 FTE
NAT-TCR BCL Manufacturing Inc 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Ybl, LLC 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Chester County Hospital 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Hoehne Rehabilitation Center 5.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE voestalpine Roll Forming Corporation Indiana Division 77 FTE
NAT-SIZE J.A. Sauer Co. 77 FTE
NAT-SIZE Infinity Molding & Assembly, Inc. 77 FTE
NAT-SIZE 010 - Stout Field Elementary 77 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.