Mattresses (i.e., box spring, innerspring, noninnerspring) manufacturing · Florida

OMF Orlando Inc.

Winter Park, FL · ~28 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

OMF Orlando Inc. runs at 154% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Mattresses (i.e., box spring, innerspring, noninnerspring) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

OMF Orlando Inc.: 5.1 TCR = 154% of Mattresses (i.e., box spring, innerspring, noninnerspring) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

OMF Orlando Inc. safety composite

OMF Orlando Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.0

2016→2024

OMF Orlando Inc. injury rate improved

OMF Orlando Inc.'s TCR fell 3.0 from 8.5 in 2016 to 5.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 8.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.09× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=8.5 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=5.5 · 2019=3.3 · 2020=6.2 · 2021=5.3 · 2022=6.3 · 2024=5.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 337910 · Winter Park, FL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.1 · 154% of ind

  • DART 5.5 DART
  • RANK #5/10
  • PHOTO Branch #0016 Monroe,…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~28 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Branch #0016 Monroe, GA Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

OMF Orlando Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows OMF Orlando Inc. averages 5.1 TCR (154% of the Mattresses (i.e., box spring, innerspring, noninnerspring) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

OMF Orlando Inc. TCR series: 2016=8.5 · 2017=0 · 2018=5.5 · 2019=3.3 · 2020=6.2 · 2021=5.3 · 2022=6.3 · 2024=5.5 · BLS 3.3

Where OMF Orlando Inc. falls in its industry

160 Mattresses (i.e., box spring, establishments

Safer than 36% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 10 Mattresses (i.e., box spring, employers in Florida.

OMF Orlando Inc. (28 employees, TCR 5.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 3.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate OMF Orlando Inc.
OMF Orlando Inc. (28 employees, TCR 5.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 3.8

OMF Orlando Inc. has fewer employees than the Mattresses (i.e., box spring, innersprin median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.5 5.5 1 0 0
2022 6.3 6.3 2 0 0
2021 5.3 5.3 1 0 0
2020 6.2 0.0 2 0 0
2019 3.3 3.3 1 0 0
2018 5.5 2.8 2 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 8.5 2.8 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

337910 · FL · Winter Park

160 Mattresses (i.e., box spring, innerspring, noninnerspring) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 116 employers in Winter Park, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Branch #0016 Monroe, GA Plant 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Paramount Industrial Companies Inc 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Latexco, LLC 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ortho Mattress Manufacturing 5.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Rosana 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Webster Nursery 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Harvesting 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ortiz Service Center 28 FTE
CITY-NEAR FL Winter Park 4,667 FTE
CITY-NEAR AdventHealth Winter Park 1,627 FTE
CITY-NEAR Winter Park Memorial Hospital 1,501 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hubbard Construction Company 869 FTE
NAT-TCR Iroquois Bar Corp 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Mason District Hospital 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Knapheide Truck Equipment Center Atlanta 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Meriter Hospital 5.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE 1262 Ocean Parkway 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE A.W. Therrien Co., Inc. 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sanchez Construction & Land 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stein's Garden & Home Wauwatosa Store 28 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.