Logistics management consulting services · Texas

On-Target Supplies & Logistics, Ltd.

Dallas, TX · ~224 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
3.8
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

On-Target Supplies & Logistics, Ltd. runs at 752% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Logistics management consulting services workplace, earning a grade F.

On-Target Supplies & Logistics, Ltd.: 3.8 TCR = 752% of Logistics management consulting services BLS 0.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

On-Target Supplies & Logistics, Ltd. safety composite

On-Target Supplies & Logistics, Ltd. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 42%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

On-Target Supplies & Logistics, Ltd. held a steady TCR band

On-Target Supplies & Logistics, Ltd.'s TCR held near 0.1 from 4.2 in 2019 to 4.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 5.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.54× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=4.2 · 2020=5.1 · 2021=2.5 · 2022=2.9 · 2024=4.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 541614 · Dallas, TX ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 3.8 · 752% of ind

  • DART 2.0 DART
  • RANK #7/10
  • PHOTO US Transportation an…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 38 inj
  • SIZE ~224 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: US Transportation and Logistics (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

On-Target Supplies & Logistics, Ltd. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows On-Target Supplies & Logistics, Ltd. averages 3.8 TCR (752% of the Logistics management consulting services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

On-Target Supplies & Logistics, Ltd. TCR series: 2019=4.2 · 2020=5.1 · 2021=2.5 · 2022=2.9 · 2024=4.1 · BLS 0.5

Where On-Target Supplies & Logistics, Ltd. falls in its industry

102 Logistics management consultin establishments

Safer than 42% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 10 Logistics management consultin employers in Texas.

On-Target Supplies & Logistics, Ltd. (224 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 83 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate On-Target Supplies & Logistics, Ltd.
On-Target Supplies & Logistics, Ltd. (224 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 83 employees and a TCR of 3.5

On-Target Supplies & Logistics, Ltd. has more employees than the Logistics management consulting services median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.1 2.0 9 1 0
2022 2.9 2.4 6 0 0
2021 2.5 1.5 5 0 0
2020 5.1 3.0 10 0 0
2019 4.2 2.6 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

541614 · TX · Dallas

102 Logistics management consulting services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 2,187 employers in Dallas, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR US Transportation and Logistics 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR CJF Shipping, LLC 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR John Deere Dubuque Works 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 3012 GSI- NIWC - Charleston 1008 3.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE STgenetics-Navasota 224 FTE
STATE-SIZE Beyer Construction 224 FTE
STATE-SIZE MLN Company 224 FTE
STATE-SIZE TX-01 224 FTE
CITY-NEAR AECOM DCS (US Operations) 15,100 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rexel USA, Inc 8,356 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1 CHILDRENS MEDICAL CENTER OF DALLAS 6,147 FTE
CITY-NEAR HDQ - Headquarters 5,764 FTE
NAT-TCR Grandview Med Ctr 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 2079 - Chicago Peterson Ave 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Martin Brothers Construction 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Saint Meinrad Archabbey 3.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE 1384 - Bakersfield NW 224 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1892 - Raleigh Central 224 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2179 - Diamond Bar 224 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2785 - Holly Springs 224 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.