Express delivery services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) · New Jersey

On The Mark Logistics LLC

Clayton, NJ · ~50 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
18.3
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

On The Mark Logistics LLC runs at 281% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Express delivery services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) workplace, earning a grade F.

On The Mark Logistics LLC: 18.3 TCR = 281% of Express delivery services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS 6.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

On The Mark Logistics LLC safety composite

On The Mark Logistics LLC scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 8%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

20/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 18.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

DART rate
F 14.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

On The Mark Logistics LLC held a steady TCR band

On The Mark Logistics LLC's TCR held near 0.0 from 18.5 in 2021 to 18.5 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 18.5 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.81× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=18.5 · 2022=17.8 · 2023=18.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492110 · Clayton, NJ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 18.3 · 281% of ind

  • DART 14.8 DART
  • RANK #199/211
  • PHOTO FedEx 910 N PARKVIEW…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~50 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: FedEx 910 N PARKVIEW CIRCLE (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

On The Mark Logistics LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows On The Mark Logistics LLC averages 18.3 TCR (281% of the Express delivery services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

On The Mark Logistics LLC TCR series: 2021=18.5 · 2022=17.8 · 2023=18.5 · BLS 6.5

Where On The Mark Logistics LLC falls in its industry

6,679 Express delivery services (exc establishments

Safer than 8% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #199 safest of 211 Express delivery services (exc employers in New Jersey.

On The Mark Logistics LLC (50 employees, TCR 18.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate On The Mark Logistics LLC
On The Mark Logistics LLC (50 employees, TCR 18.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0

On The Mark Logistics LLC has fewer employees than the Express delivery services (except establ median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 18.5 14.8 10 0 0
2022 17.8 14.8 6 0 0
2021 18.5 18.5 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492110 · NJ · Clayton

6,679 Express delivery services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 11 employers in Clayton, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR FedEx 910 N PARKVIEW CIRCLE 18.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR TXEDO - LAREDO 18.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR IDNAM - NAMPA CENTER 18.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR CASBR - SAN BRUNO 18.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Kindle Energy LLC 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE MCKEE 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE KLINE BROTHERS LANDSCAPING EAST 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kiely Civil Glassboro 50 FTE
CITY-NEAR Clayton Board of Education 270 FTE
CITY-NEAR Aleris 93 FTE
CITY-NEAR 5472-000002925 54 FTE
CITY-NEAR 5472-NAI-0034-0034-02925 51 FTE
NAT-TCR 381685-Cle-Puritas Park Br 18.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 483225-Fwt-Poly Sta 18.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 055519-Oak-Eastmont Sta 18.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Antis Roofing & Waterproofing 18.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Toshiba Business Solutions - Cleveland 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Royal Flooring and Paints of Iowa, LLC 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE USA Environmental, Inc. - Vieques 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Meadows Sheet Metal & Air Conditioning Inc. 50 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.