Commercial printing (except screen, books) · California

O'Neil Digital Solutions - Los Angeles

Los Angeles, CA · ~243 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

O'Neil Digital Solutions - Los Angeles runs at 78% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Commercial printing (except screen, books) workplace, earning a grade B.

O'Neil Digital Solutions - Los Angeles: 2.6 TCR = 78% of Commercial printing (except screen, books) BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

O'Neil Digital Solutions - Los Angeles safety composite

O'Neil Digital Solutions - Los Angeles scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 58% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.5

2020→2021

O'Neil Digital Solutions - Los Angeles injury rate improved

O'Neil Digital Solutions - Los Angeles's TCR fell 0.5 from 2.8 in 2020 to 2.4 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 2.8 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.15× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=2.8 · 2021=2.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 323111 · Los Angeles, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.6 · 78% of ind

  • DART 0.4 DART
  • RANK #63/150
  • PHOTO Bluestem Integrated …
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~243 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Bluestem Integrated LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

O'Neil Digital Solutions - Los Angeles in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows O'Neil Digital Solutions - Los Angeles averages 2.6 TCR (78% of the Commercial printing (except screen, books) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

O'Neil Digital Solutions - Los Angeles TCR series: 2020=2.8 · 2021=2.4 · BLS 3.3

Where O'Neil Digital Solutions - Los Angeles falls in its industry

2,001 Commercial printing (except sc establishments

Safer than 51% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #63 safest of 150 Commercial printing (except sc employers in California.

O'Neil Digital Solutions - Los Angeles (243 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250300 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate O'Neil Digital Solutions - Los Angeles
O'Neil Digital Solutions - Los Angeles (243 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6

O'Neil Digital Solutions - Los Angeles has more employees than the Commercial printing (except screen, book median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 2.4 0.4 6 0 0
2020 2.8 1.1 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

323111 · CA · Los Angeles

2,001 Commercial printing (except screen, books) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 2,064 employers in Los Angeles, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Bluestem Integrated LLC 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Visalia F&L 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brook & Whittle, Ltd. - Amherst 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR MAGGIO DATA CORP 2.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE CUPERTINO SERVICE CENTER & DE 243 FTE
STATE-SIZE DPR Construction - Sacramento 243 FTE
STATE-SIZE Santa Ana Creek Development 243 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tutor Perini/O&G Joint Venture PL2 243 FTE
CITY-NEAR Live Nation Worldwide, Inc. 50,317 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Los Angeles 40,333 FTE
CITY-NEAR LADWP 11,717 FTE
CITY-NEAR Los Angeles Department of Water and Power 10,346 FTE
NAT-TCR FedEx Supply Chain - MGH Groveport 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Metro Dentalcare-Richfield 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR MCC 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Columbus Truck & Equipment Center, LLc 2.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Baltimore Office 243 FTE
NAT-SIZE GOBI Library Solutions from EBSCO 243 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hcc Corporate-Elgin 243 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jupiter Aluminum Corporation 243 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.