Travel trailers, recreational, manufacturing · California

Ontario Plant

Ontario, CA · ~69 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ontario Plant runs at 161% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Travel trailers, recreational, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Ontario Plant: 5.3 TCR = 161% of Travel trailers, recreational, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ontario Plant safety composite

Ontario Plant scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 65% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 26%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 5.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 65% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Ontario Plant held a steady TCR band

Ontario Plant's TCR held near 0.1 from 6.5 in 2016 to 6.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 10.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.8× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.5 · 2017=10.5 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=5.9 · 2020=1.8 · 2021=10.0 · 2022=1.3 · 2023=5.5 · 2024=6.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336214 · Ontario, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.3 · 161% of ind

  • DART 4.3 DART
  • RANK #6/9
  • PHOTO Keystone RV Company …
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 35 inj
  • SIZE ~69 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Keystone RV Company - Plant 20 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Ontario Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ontario Plant averages 5.3 TCR (161% of the Travel trailers, recreational, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ontario Plant TCR series: 2016=6.5 · 2017=10.5 · 2018=0 · 2019=5.9 · 2020=1.8 · 2021=10 · 2022=1.3 · 2023=5.5 · 2024=6.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Ontario Plant falls in its industry

262 Travel trailers, recreational, establishments

Safer than 65% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 9 Travel trailers, recreational, employers in California.

Ontario Plant (69 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 121 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Ontario Plant
Ontario Plant (69 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 121 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Ontario Plant has fewer employees than the Travel trailers, recreational, manufactu median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.4 4.3 6 0 0
2023 5.5 4.6 6 0 0
2022 1.3 0.0 1 0 0
2021 10.0 5.0 3 3 0
2020 1.8 1.8 1 0 0
2019 5.9 4.7 5 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 10.5 8.2 9 0 0
2016 6.5 1.6 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336214 · CA · Ontario

262 Travel trailers, recreational, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 599 employers in Ontario, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Keystone RV Company - Plant 20 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lance Camper 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Aluminum Trailer Company 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Keystone Plant 2 5.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Woolf Enterprises 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE Terranova Ranch, Inc 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rayo Shop 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sun Pacific Harvesting | Citrus Harvesting 69 FTE
CITY-NEAR Prime Healthcare Services Inc. Location: St. Mary's, Passaic LLC 46-3499370 (HP29) 10,997 FTE
CITY-NEAR CAONA - ONTARIO HUB 4,372 FTE
CITY-NEAR ONTARIO HUB (CAONA) 3,354 FTE
CITY-NEAR Atlantic Solutions Group Inc, Inc. DBA Empire Workforce Solutions 3,240 FTE
NAT-TCR Detroit Center 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Valu Home Center #19 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Franklin Terminal 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Southampton, NY 5.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Florida 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trader Joe's 0705 Schaumburg 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE Powder Processing and Technology, LLC 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lawter, Inc. 69 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.