Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard · South Carolina

Opus Packaging - Florence

Florence, SC · ~51 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Opus Packaging - Florence runs at 14% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard workplace, earning a grade A.

Opus Packaging - Florence: 0.5 TCR = 14% of Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Opus Packaging - Florence safety composite

Opus Packaging - Florence scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 96% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 96% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Opus Packaging - Florence: 0.0 → 1.8 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 1.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Opus Packaging - Florence's TCR rose 1.8 from 0.0 in 2021 to 1.8 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322211 · Florence, SC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 14% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/23
  • PHOTO American Packaging C…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~51 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: American Packaging Corporation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Opus Packaging - Florence in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Opus Packaging - Florence averages 0.5 TCR (14% of the Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Opus Packaging - Florence TCR series: 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=1.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Opus Packaging - Florence falls in its industry

1,338 Boxes, corrugated and solid fi establishments

Safer than 96% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 23 Boxes, corrugated and solid fi employers in South Carolina.

Opus Packaging - Florence (51 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0123456 Average employees Total Case Rate Opus Packaging - Florence
Opus Packaging - Florence (51 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Opus Packaging - Florence has fewer employees than the Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.8 0.0 0 1 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322211 · SC · Florence

1,338 Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 208 employers in Florence, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR American Packaging Corporation 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA HEXACOMB 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4322 Fort Worth Container 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Glendale Container 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Minto - Hilton Head Construction, Land and Mastercare 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE MYR 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Small Capital Projects 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Fitts Company, Inc. 51 FTE
CITY-NEAR McLeod Regional Medical Center 3,889 FTE
CITY-NEAR MCLEOD REG MED CTR OF PEE DEE MH101 3,883 FTE
CITY-NEAR MCLEOD PHYSICIAN ASSOCIATES MH104 1,867 FTE
CITY-NEAR McLeod Physician Associates II 1,386 FTE
NAT-TCR Washington Administrative Services 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Kraus Port Washington 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Magnatone Hearing Aid Corporation 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR MCFFO 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Boyd Metals of Joplin Missouri 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Howard Industries 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE 5090 - CO Mesa County 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Utility Tri-State, Inc.-Alma 51 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.