Digital test equipment (e.g., electronic and electrical circuits and equipment testing) manufacturing · Oregon

OR-Beaverton

Beaverton, OR · ~45 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

OR-Beaverton runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Digital test equipment (e.g., electronic and electrical circuits and equipment testing) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

OR-Beaverton: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Digital test equipment (e.g., electronic and electrical circuits and equipment testing) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

OR-Beaverton safety composite

OR-Beaverton scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

OR-Beaverton held a steady TCR band

OR-Beaverton's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 0.0 TCR.

2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334515 · Beaverton, OR AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/6
  • PHOTO Tektronix, Inc (39)
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~45 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Tektronix, Inc (39) (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

OR-Beaverton in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows OR-Beaverton averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Digital test equipment (e.g., electronic and electrical circuits and equipment testing) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

OR-Beaverton TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where OR-Beaverton falls in its industry

125 Digital test equipment (e.g., establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 6 Digital test equipment (e.g., employers in Oregon.

OR-Beaverton (45 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 0.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate OR-Beaverton
OR-Beaverton (45 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 0.9

OR-Beaverton has fewer employees than the Digital test equipment (e.g., electronic median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334515 · OR · Beaverton

125 Digital test equipment (e.g., electronic and electrical circuits and equipment testing) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 240 employers in Beaverton, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Tektronix, Inc (39) 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Landis+Gyr Alpharetta GA 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tempo Communications, Inc. 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Elster Solutions LLC (Honeywell) 0.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Willamette Nurseries, Inc. 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pelton Round-Butte 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE 00414 GRANTS PASS OPNS CTR 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE 00474 BEND OPERATIONS CTR 45 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nike World Headquarters 14,796 FTE
CITY-NEAR 004-Nike Air Manufacturing Oregon 1,585 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tailwind (IHM - Beaverton) 1,170 FTE
CITY-NEAR Analog Devices 907 FTE
NAT-TCR One Federal Street 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR City of Fremont - Community Support Includes Recreation and Human Services 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Cardinal Health 7000 and 7200 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Cedar Bay Entertainment LLC 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Precision Marshall Steel 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trifecta Painting & Construction 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE 901 S 3rd Street & 4505 Prosperity Drive 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE Flint MI FXFE-FNT 45 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.