Berries Packing House · Oregon

Oregon Berry Packing Inc.

Hillsboro, OR · ~60 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
5.1
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Oregon Berry Packing Inc. runs at 114% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Berries Packing House workplace, earning a grade C.

Oregon Berry Packing Inc.: 5.1 TCR = 114% of Berries Packing House BLS 4.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Oregon Berry Packing Inc. safety composite

Oregon Berry Packing Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 61% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−10.7

2016→2024

Oregon Berry Packing Inc. injury rate improved

Oregon Berry Packing Inc.'s TCR fell 10.7 from 12.3 in 2016 to 1.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 12.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.31× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=12.3 · 2017=4.5 · 2018=8.4 · 2019=6.1 · 2020=3.6 · 2021=1.6 · 2022=6.5 · 2023=1.6 · 2024=1.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 113210 · Hillsboro, OR ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 5.1 · 114% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #3/5
  • PHOTO Aurora
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~60 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Aurora (1.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Oregon Berry Packing Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Oregon Berry Packing Inc. averages 5.1 TCR (114% of the Berries Packing House BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Oregon Berry Packing Inc. TCR series: 2016=12.3 · 2017=4.5 · 2018=8.4 · 2019=6.1 · 2020=3.6 · 2021=1.6 · 2022=6.5 · 2023=1.6 · 2024=1.6 · BLS 4.5

Where Oregon Berry Packing Inc. falls in its industry

14 Berries Packing House establishments

Safer than 50% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 5 Berries Packing House employers in Oregon.

Oregon Berry Packing Inc. (60 employees, TCR 5.1) among 10 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 40 employees and a TCR of 8.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 11 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate PRT HubbardHull Forest ProductsEI055 - Badoura NurseryGaston Tree Debris & Recycling, LLCElktonSS-Harvest SouthAuroraSS-Harvest WestPRT BrightonPRT Cottage GroveOregon Berry Packing Inc.
Oregon Berry Packing Inc. (60 employees, TCR 5.1) among 10 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 40 employees and a TCR of 8.2

Oregon Berry Packing Inc. has more employees than the Berries Packing House median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.6 1.6 1 0 0
2023 1.6 1.6 1 0 0
2022 6.5 5.2 5 0 0
2021 1.6 1.6 1 0 0
2020 3.6 1.8 2 0 0
2019 6.1 0.0 1 2 0
2018 8.4 2.1 1 3 0
2017 4.5 0.0 0 3 0
2016 12.3 7.7 0 8 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

113210 · OR · Hillsboro

14 Berries Packing House employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 282 employers in Hillsboro, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Aurora 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gaston Tree Debris & Recycling, LLC 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR SS-Harvest West 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nisqually 2.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Crestline 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE FM Cedar Village, LLC 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE Winco Powerline Services 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE 10610000 WESTSIDE MEDICAL CENTER 60 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ronler Acres Campus 11,998 FTE
CITY-NEAR Jones Farm Campus 7,114 FTE
CITY-NEAR Aloha Campus 1,688 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hawthorn Farm Campus 1,638 FTE
NAT-TCR AI International, Inc. 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Hilton Garden Inn Omaha West 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Inland Envelope Company 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR East Penn Sanitation Inc. 5.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Quaker Houghton 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE T.D logistiks LLC 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE National Distributors Leasing, Inc. 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amberwood Manor 60 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.