Lumber (e.g., dressed, finished, rough) merchant wholesalers · Arizona

OrePac Building Products - Phoenix

Phoenix, AZ · ~62 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.0
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

OrePac Building Products - Phoenix runs at 545% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Lumber (e.g., dressed, finished, rough) merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade F.

OrePac Building Products - Phoenix: 12.0 TCR = 545% of Lumber (e.g., dressed, finished, rough) merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

OrePac Building Products - Phoenix safety composite

OrePac Building Products - Phoenix scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 58% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

35/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−15.4

2021→2023

OrePac Building Products - Phoenix injury rate improved

OrePac Building Products - Phoenix's TCR fell 15.4 from 18.5 in 2021 to 3.1 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 18.5 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.13× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=18.5 · 2022=14.4 · 2023=3.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423310 · Phoenix, AZ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 12.0 · 545% of ind

  • DART 1.5 DART
  • RANK #15/15
  • PHOTO New England Gypsum H…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~62 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: New England Gypsum Hartford (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

OrePac Building Products - Phoenix in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows OrePac Building Products - Phoenix averages 12.0 TCR (545% of the Lumber (e.g., dressed, finished, rough) merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

OrePac Building Products - Phoenix TCR series: 2021=18.5 · 2022=14.4 · 2023=3.1 · BLS 2.2

Where OrePac Building Products - Phoenix falls in its industry

1,225 Lumber (e.g., dressed, finishe establishments

Safer than 6% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 15 Lumber (e.g., dressed, finishe employers in Arizona.

OrePac Building Products - Phoenix (62 employees, TCR 12.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 41 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 020406080100120 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate OrePac Building Products - Phoenix
OrePac Building Products - Phoenix (62 employees, TCR 12.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 41 employees and a TCR of 4.2

OrePac Building Products - Phoenix has more employees than the Lumber (e.g., dressed, finished, rough) median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 3.1 1.5 2 0 0
2022 14.4 14.4 1 8 0
2021 18.5 18.5 1 10 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423310 · AZ · Phoenix

1,225 Lumber (e.g., dressed, finished, rough) merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 2,630 employers in Phoenix, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR New England Gypsum Hartford 12.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Westside San Diego 12.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chicago 11.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Badgerland Hartland 11.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Story of AZ - Watkins 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE Taylor Morrison of Florida, Inc. 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE 8768-SRP NGS 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE Phoenix Office 62 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maricopa County 15,504 FTE
CITY-NEAR Phoenix Children's Hospital 7,575 FTE
CITY-NEAR All Company 6,261 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030500 6,153 FTE
NAT-TCR Parsons House Frisco 12.0 TCR
NAT-TCR highway, street and bridge construction 12.0 TCR
NAT-TCR HG358 12.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 5472-NAI-0032-0032-00185 12.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Breeze Air Conditioning, LLC. 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE Central Paving Co., Inc. 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE Portsmouth - BMD 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE AIG Michigan 62 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.