Business management services · Wisconsin

Organic Valley Cashton Office Building (COB)

Cashton, WI · ~272 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Organic Valley Cashton Office Building (COB) runs at 24% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Business management services workplace, earning a grade A.

Organic Valley Cashton Office Building (COB): 0.6 TCR = 24% of Business management services BLS 2.6 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Organic Valley Cashton Office Building (COB) safety composite

Organic Valley Cashton Office Building (COB) scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 0.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.4

2023→2024

Organic Valley Cashton Office Building (COB) injury rate improved

Organic Valley Cashton Office Building (COB)'s TCR fell 0.4 from 0.8 in 2023 to 0.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 0.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=0.8 · 2024=0.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561110 · Cashton, WI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 24% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/15
  • PHOTO 3LS Inc
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~272 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 3LS Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Organic Valley Cashton Office Building (COB) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Organic Valley Cashton Office Building (COB) averages 0.6 TCR (24% of the Business management services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Organic Valley Cashton Office Building (COB) TCR series: 2023=0.8 · 2024=0.4 · BLS 2.6

Where Organic Valley Cashton Office Building (COB) falls in its industry

544 Business management services establishments

Safer than 70% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 15 Business management services employers in Wisconsin.

Organic Valley Cashton Office Building (COB) (272 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 117 employees and a TCR of 1.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Organic Valley Cashton Office Building (COB)
Organic Valley Cashton Office Building (COB) (272 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 117 employees and a TCR of 1.2

Organic Valley Cashton Office Building (COB) has more employees than the Business management services median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.4 0.0 1 0 0
2023 0.8 0.8 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561110 · WI · Cashton

544 Business management services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 6 employers in Cashton, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 3LS Inc 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Logistics Company - Benning TMP 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR MTNT, Ltd. 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Guardian Water and Power 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Interior Installation Services 272 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lactalis American Group Inc. - Belmont 272 FTE
STATE-SIZE Airways 272 FTE
STATE-SIZE IRIS USA, Inc. Pleasant Prairie WI 272 FTE
CITY-NEAR Organic Valley Cashton DC 98 FTE
CITY-NEAR Scenic Bluffs Community Health Centers 85 FTE
CITY-NEAR CALF (Conversion and Labelling Facility) 64 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cashton Farm Supply, LTD 42 FTE
NAT-TCR RCUH/Core Staff 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR J.F. Electric, Incorporated 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Akins Excavating CO 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Virginia City Hybrid Energy Center 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE the kearney companies LLC. 272 FTE
NAT-SIZE COLLEGEVILLE 272 FTE
NAT-SIZE Colorado 272 FTE
NAT-SIZE Midlothian 272 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.